World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review

Article Id: WHEBN0002141252
Reproduction Date:

Title: United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: William Curtis Bryson, Edward Leavy, Patriot Act, Title II, United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, Federal tribunals in the United States
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review

United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review
(FISCR)
Seal of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review
Location Washington, D.C.
Established 1978
Chief judge William C. Bryson
Active judges 3

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review (FISCR) is a U.S. federal court whose sole purpose is to review denials of applications for electronic surveillance warrants (called FISA warrants) by the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (or FISC). The FISCR was established by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (known as FISA for short) and consists of a panel of three judges. Like the FISC, the FISCR is not an adversarial court; rather, the only party to the court is the federal government, although other parties may submit briefs as amici curiae if they are made aware of the proceedings. Papers are filed and proceedings are held in secret. Records of the proceedings are kept classified, though copies of the proceedings with sensitive information redacted are very occasionally made public. The government may appeal decisions of the FISCR to the Supreme Court, which hears appeals on a discretionary basis.

There is no provision for review or appeal of a grant of a warrant application, only of a denial. That is because in both the FISC and the FISCA, the government - the party who seeks a warrant to conduct surveillance - is the only party before the court, and it is unusual for anyone else to become aware of the warrant application at all, much less to oppose it or appeal it.

The judges of the Court of Review are district or appellate federal judges, appointed by the Chief Justice of the United States for seven-year terms. Their terms are staggered so that there are at least two years between consecutive appointments. A judge may be appointed only once to either the FISCR or the FISC.

Notable cases

In re Sealed Case

The FISCR was called into session for the first time in 2002 in a case referred to as In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001. The FISC had granted a FISA warrant to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) but had placed restrictions on its use; specifically, the FBI was denied the ability to use evidence gathered under the warrant in criminal cases. FISCR allowed a coalition of civil liberties groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, to file amicus briefs opposing the FBI's new surveillance programs. The FISCR held that the restrictions that the FISC had placed on the warrant violated both FISA and the USA PATRIOT Act and that there was no constitutional requirement for those restrictions.

In re Directives

In August 2008, the FISCR affirmed the constitutionality of the Protect America Act of 2007 in a heavily redacted opinion, In re Directives [redacted text] Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, released on January 15, 2009.[1][2][3] In re Directives was only the second such public ruling since FISA's enactment.[4]

Composition

Current membership

Name Court Date appointed Term expiry Reference
William Curtis Bryson (presiding) Federal May 19, 2011
Sept. 10, 2013 (presiding)
May 18, 2018 [5][6]
José A. Cabranes Second August 9, 2013 May, 2020 [7][8]
Richard C. Tallman Ninth January 27, 2014 January 26, 2021 [9]

Former members

Name Court Date appointed Term expiry Reference
Morris S. Arnold Eighth May 19, 2008
May 19, 2012 (presiding)
Aug. 31, 2013 [10][6][5]
Bruce Marshall Selya First October 8, 2005
May 19, 2008 (presiding)
May 18, 2012 [5]
Ralph K. Winter, Jr. Second November 14, 2003 May 18, 2010 [5]
Edward Leavy Ninth September 25, 2001
May 19, 2005 (presiding)
May 18, 2008 [5]
Ralph B. Guy, Jr. Sixth October 8, 1998
May 19, 2001 (presiding)
May 18, 2005 [5]
Laurence H. Silberman D.C. June 18, 1996 May 18, 2003 [5]
Paul Hitch Roney (presiding) Eleventh September 13, 1994 May 18, 2001 [11][5]
Bobby R. Baldock Tenth June 17, 1992 May 18, 1998 [5]
Robert W. Warren E.D. Wis. October 30, 1989 May 18, 1996 [5]
Collins J. Seitz (presiding) Third March 19, 1987 March 18, 1994 [5]
Edward Skottowe Northrop D. Md. January 11, 1985 January 10, 1992 [5]
John A. Field Fourth May 19, 1982 May 18, 1989 [5]
A. Leon Higginbotham, Jr. (presiding) Third May 19, 1979 May 18, 1986 [5]
James E. Barrett Tenth May 19, 1979 May 18, 1984 [5]
George MacKinnon D.C. May 19, 1979 May 18, 1982 [5]
Note that the start dates of service for some judges conflict among sources.

References

  1. ^ In re Directives [redacted text] Pursuant to Section 105B of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, no. 08-01 (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, Jan 15, 2009)
  2. ^ Risen, James; Lichtblau, Eric (January 16, 2009). "Court Affirms Wiretapping Without Warrants". New York Times, January 15, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009. 
  3. ^ Perez, Evan (January 16, 2009). "Court Backs U.S. Wiretapping". Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009. 
  4. ^ "Intelligence Court Releases Ruling in Favor of Warrantless Wiretapping". Washington Post, January 15, 2009. January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009. 
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p
    • Savage, Charles (May 2013). "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court / Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review: Current and Past Members". The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 26, 2013. Retrieved July 26, 2013. 
    • Savage, Charlie (July 25, 2013). "Roberts's Picks Reshaping Secret Surveillance Court". The New York Times. Retrieved July 26, 2013. 
  6. ^ a b http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/2013/09/response-lags/
  7. ^ Barnes, Robert (August 19, 2013). "Roberts names judge to panel that hears rare appeals of surveillance court rulings". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 19, 2013. 
  8. ^ Savage, Charlie (August 20, 2013). "Roberts Varies Pattern in Choice for Spy Court". The New York Times. Retrieved August 20, 2013. 
  9. ^ Aftergood, Steven (7 February 2014). "FISA Court Appointments, Potential Reforms, and More from CRS". Secrecy News. Retrieved 7 February 2014. 
  10. ^ 2013 membership
  11. ^ "Judge Paul H. Roney". http://web.archive.org/web/20060923115648/http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/about/judges/roney.php. Retrieved 2013-06-14. 

Further reading

  • "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and Court of Review 2014 Membership". from the Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved February 7, 2014. 
  • Risen, James; Lichtblau, Eric (January 16, 2009). "Court Affirms Wiretapping Without Warrants". New York Times, January 15, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009. 
  • Perez, Evan (January 16, 2009). "Court Backs U.S. Wiretapping". Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009. 
  • "Intelligence Court Releases Ruling in Favor of Warrantless Wiretapping". Washington Post, January 15, 2009. January 16, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009. 
  • "Court ruling endorses Bush surveillance policy". Associated Press, January 15, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009. 
  • Pudlow, Jan (September 1, 2000). "Nixon era judges celebrate 30 years on the bench". The Florida Bar News, September 1, 2000. Retrieved September 30, 2012. 

External links

  • Rules of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, via Federation of American Scientists
  • The Department of Justice brief on Case No. 02-001, redacted version, via Federation of American Scientists
  • FISCOR Hearing transcript on 02-001, via Federation of American Scientists
  • The Court of Review's Decision on "In re: Sealed Case No. 02-001", from Findlaw
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.