World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Balkar and Karachay nationalism

Article Id: WHEBN0026854025
Reproduction Date:

Title: Balkar and Karachay nationalism  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Bosnian nationalism, Asturian nationalism, Argentine nationalism, Padanian nationalism, Sri Lankan Tamil nationalism
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Balkar and Karachay nationalism

Balkar and Karachai nationalism is the national sentiment among the Balkars and Karachai. It generally manifests itself in:

  • The movement for the recognition of the 1944 deportations (where the Balkars and Karachai, along with the Kalmyks, Chechens, Ingush and later Estonians, Latvians and Volga Germans were deported to Siberia and Kazakhstan, with considerable portions of the nation massacred by Russian troops and historical documents burned in mass fires) as a genocide against the nation.[1][2]
  • The movement to separate Kabardino-Balkaria into Kabardin and Balkar administrative units
  • Likewise, the movement to separate Karachay–Cherkessia into Karachay and Cherkess administrative units
  • The movement to unify Karachai and Balkar units into a single republic
  • The movement to unify the census categories of Karachai and Balkar into a single category
  • Turkic nationalist flavor, and a strong affinity to the state of Turkey
  • Defense of Balkar grazing lands against Kabardin influence [3]
  • As is also the case with Circassian nationalism or Chechen nationalism (to a lesser extent), Balkar-Karachay nationalism is considered incompatible with Islam in government as the ethnic identity is considered most important and other allegiances are considered treacherous.

Historical context

The 1944 Deportations and their effect on the modern movement

In 1943 and 1944, the Balkars and Karachais were deported en masse to Siberia, as were the Chechens, Ingush and Kalmyks. All groups were accused of "collaboration with the Nazis".[4][5]

After the deportation, as happened to the other victims, the Balkars and Karachais were stripped of all political recognition of their territories. The Kabardino-Balkar Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic ASSR was made the Kabardian ASSR, while the Karachay Autonomous Oblast was completely wiped of the map and partitioned into territories given to the Stavropol Krai and Krasnodar krai.[4]

The account of the [6][7]

  • Peoples deported were 39,407 Balkars, 71,869 Karachai, 412,548 Chechens, 96,327 Ingush, and 104,146 Kalmyks
  • According to the NKVD, the average death rate of those deported was about 23.5% (144,704 people)

Many historians[7][8][9][10] have questioned the authenticity of the NKVD report, stating that it was probably a far understatement, noting also that the figure produced by Khruschev in 1956 contradicts Beria's figure by at least 96,000 people (and stating that even Khrushchev's could have been an understatement, considering his position).

Contrary to the Soviet view of the whole nations as treacherous Nazi-collaborators, according to the official statistics, 4428 of deported Chechens, 946 Ingush, 2543 Karachai, and 1045 Balkars were veterans of the Red Army.[5][11]

As is the case with the other victims of this deportation, as well as many of the Soviet deportations as a whole, the Balkars and Karachais view it as a national tragedy, a central part of the nation's victimhood, and demand it be recognized as a genocide.[4]

Since 1985

Origins and rise

Balkar/Karachay nationalism in its current reincarnation first became visible during the glasnost era when the Soviet Union was ruled by the reform-minded Mikhail Gorbachev although the population may have had various nationalist sentiments widely manifested among themselves before, as many of their neighbors did. At first, nationalist organizations watered down their rhetoric in order to not provoke a crackdown.

The Balkars and Karachays were relatively late compared to their neighbors in seizing autonomy and establishing visible national demands and movements, partly due to their lesser numbers and even lesser intelligentsia class. The first congresses for Balkars and Karachays were formed as late as 1991.[4]

In general, Caucasus independence movements in the glasnost era were much more assertive and aggressive, being more similar to their Baltic counterparts which they often exchanged tactics with. In 1986, an important stepping stone was the release and popularity of the Georgian film Repentance,[12] which had undertones regarding the falsification of history by Moscow and the repression of nations. The film instantly became a hit across the mountains, and even more so after its politicization (leading to Shevardnadze actively protecting its director from Kremlin reprisal.[13] The film had at least 30 million viewers after its first year of release, despite being described as a mediocre film.[14] It was not long before Georgian nationalism in earnest began to make itself heard.

The second people in the Caucasus to develop a popular movement against Soviet power were the Chechens, who founded the Caucasus' first anti-Soviet group, Kavkaz, in the summer of 1988.[15] Kavkaz was originally disguised as an environmentalist group, perhaps earnestly, though it was agreed early on by its members that an establishment of autonomy would be the only way to secure their demands, including environmental protection. Soon, in Tbilisi, the Round Table/Free Georgia bloc was founded,. Due to the Georgians' more powerful and confident position, it was inclined to much more inflammatory and openly nationalistic rhetoric of the historian and literary critic Zviad Gamsakhurdia. As the ethnic Armenian Caucasus expert Georgi Derluguian points out, All-Union conferences, intended for national unity, accomplished the opposite. Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian intellectuals exchanged ideas with the Chechens and Georgians (and later other Caucasians), and at times even programmatic documents.[16] This led to a radicalization of demands of all involved groups, as they became increasingly aware of the mass dislike toward the Russian center. It also led to the accelerating spread of nationalism to other groups.

In 1989, the hugely inadequate government response to the earthquakes in Armenia and Azerbaijan triggered a mass desertion of the Soviet system in general by the Eastern Caucasian regions (Armenia, Azerbaijan and Dagestan) that had been relatively loyal previously. The Azeri Popular Front, formed in 1989, was to become a pole to which the opposition gravitated. It's habitually theatrical activities paired with its occasional tendency to cite pan-Turkist ideology and the ethnic similarities between Azeris and the Karachays and Balkars drew the mass interest of the Balkar and Karachay public. Nonetheless, their activities remained timid. It wasn't until 1991, after Georgia and Armenia had already seceded from the Soviet Union, Dudayev had defected from the Red Army (while back in Checheno-Ingushetia the anti-Zavgayev forces were gathering power), and Azerbaijan was preparing to leave the union (only Dagestan had no plans for secession, because of its own multiethnic makeup and fragile situation), that the Balkars and Karachay began to stage their own demands.

However, as was the case with other such movements, the rhetoric was slowly stepped up, especially as, after the Russian Federation was formed, Balkars and Karachais were angered by the perception that the center in Moscow wanted to re-centralize their territory (including a possible abolition of their autonomy). This was confirmed with Vladimir Putin's actions in 2000, and his explicitly stated policy advocating "enlargement of regions of Russia".[17] Sergei Mironov stated on March 30, 2002 that "89 federation subjects is too much, but larger regional units are easier to manage" and that the goal was to merge them into 7 federal districts. Gradually, over time, ethnic republics were to be abolished to accomplish this goal of integration.[17][18]

Russian Federation era

The Balkars are often seen as being much more overtly active than the Karachay, due to their lack of representation in the republican government (the Karachay are the dominant group in most of Karachay–Cherkessia). Karachay nationalists, as many Cherkess activists moan (see Circassian nationalism), recently have been increasingly present and arguably influential in the government of Karachay–Cherkessia (often at the expense of Cherkess members), so there is less need for open protesting and other such activities.

In 1992, however, when the Karachay launched a massive autonomist campaign, and Boris Yeltsin eventually "suggested" a split of the Karachey-Cherkess republic into two ethnic republics. However, at that time, the control of the republic was still in the hands of Russians and Cherkess, who, in a moment of unity (one of the very last instances of good relations between the Russians and Circassians in the republic, who are often bitterly resentful of each other), quickly scrapped the bill, provoking the rage of the Karachay populace. However, at this point, the Karachay were more or less politically incapable of retaliating.[4] This and the subsequent repression of Karachay aspirations is seen by some to be an important precursor to the fierce later repression of Cherkess irridentism by the Karachay-led government, which even resorted to historical-based attacks on Circassian nationalism (questioning the Circassian ethnicity of the man who first scaled Elbrus). Others, however, see it as "artificial tensions" created by puppet governments (be they run by ethnic Cherkess or by Karachay) of Moscow.

Many people, ranging from Circassian activist coordinators to Nagorno-Karabakh War, which Russia also insists on mediating), creating "unnatural conflicts" that can only be solved by Kremlin intervention, keeping Caucasian peoples both weak and dependent on Russia to mediate their conflicts.[19] Sufian Jemukhov and Alexei Bekshokov, leaders of the "Circassian Sports Initiative" stated that the conflict "has the potential to blow up the whole Caucasus into a bloody mess with the mass civilian casualties and therefore keep the Circassians from opposing the Sochi Winter Olympics...Moscow plays the conflict scenario when the participants do not have the ability to solve the conflict, but the conflict is absolutely manageable and can be easily solved by its rulers from the Kremlin."[19]

In 1996, the Kabardin-Balkar republic's Kremlin-installed government responded to demands to split the republic in two with mass arrests and repression.[4]

Genocide recognition campaign

The campaign for the recognition of the genocide is a central tenet and article of faith for Balkar and Karachay activists. It embodies the sense of persecution and loneliness felt by the Balkar and Karachay populace.

Karachai and Balkar nationalists often hold rallies on the "genocide anniversary".[2] On March 8, 2010, one such rally in Nal'chik (Kabardino-Balkaria) attracted hundreds of protesters, demanding "self-determination" for the Balkar people, claiming the Kabardin and Russian dominated parliament did nothing to address their woes.[1] The rally drew some protest from the Russian population (calling it "separatist" and "subversive") and from the local government.

In 2010, in a conciliatory move (an attempt to defuse the three-way tensions between Russians, Circassians and Balkars in Kabardino-Balkaria), President Kanokov of the Kabardino-Balkar Republic recognized the deportations as genocide, echoing statements made by the Chechen separatist government, Estonia[20][21] and a memorial at Vilna in Lithuania[22] in solidarity with the Balkars and Karachai people as fellow deportation victims.[1]

See also


  1. ^ a b c Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (9 March 2010). "'"Balkar Activists Demand 'Self-Determination. SperoNews. Retrieved 7 April 2010. 
  2. ^ a b Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (8 March 2010). "Balkars Commemorate Deportation To Central Asia". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 7 April 2010. 
  3. ^
  4. ^ a b c d e f Liz Fuller (31 May 2005). "Russia: Balkars Launch New Campaign For Own Republic". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Retrieved 7 April 2010. 
  5. ^ a b King, Charles. The Ghost of Freedom: A History of the Caucasus. Oxford, 2010 (updated version). p196-198
  6. ^ Ediev, Dalkhat. Demographicheskie poteri deportirovannykh narodov SSSR. Stavropol' 2003, Table 109. Page 302
  7. ^ a b Wood, Tony.Chechnya: The Case for Independence. Verso: London 2007. Pages 34-39
  8. ^ a b Dunlop, John. Russia Confronts Chechnya: Roots of a Separatist Conflict. Cambridge 1998. Pages 62-70
  9. ^ a b Gammer, Moshe. Lone Wolf and Bear: Three Centuries of Chechen Defiance to Russian Rule. London 2006. Page 166-171
  10. ^ Nekrich, Punished Peoples
  11. ^ "Chislennost' spetspereselentsev, ranee sluzhivshikh v Krasnoi Armii", reprinted in Pobol' and Polian, eds, Stalinskie deportatsii, p765-66
  12. ^ King, Charles. The Ghost of Freedom: A History of the Caucasus. Oxford, 2010 (updated version). p210-221
  13. ^ Shevardnadze, Eduard. The Future Belongs to Freedom. New York: Free Press, 1991. Pages 172 and 173
  14. ^ Josephine Woll and Denise J. Youngblood. Repentance. I.B. Tauris: London, 2001. page 91.
  15. ^ Wood, Tony. Chechnya. Pages 46-51.
  16. ^ Derluguian. Bourdieu's Secret Admirer in the Caucasus. Page 150.
  17. ^ a b
  18. ^ Anastasia Matveeva, Maxim Momot (2 April 2010). "Journal of RBC: The Kremlin once again pondered the enlargement of regions". Adygea NatPress. Retrieved 6 April 2010.  Available, translated from Russian to English by Google:
  19. ^ a b Fatima Tlisova (25 November 2009). swords=8fd5893941d69d0be3f378576261ae3e&tx_ttnews[any_of_the_words]=Olympics%20Jarkasi&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=35777&tx_ttnews[backPid]=7&cHash=a2cdfa7acb "Circassians in Karachaevo-Cherkessia Plan Mass Protest"]. Eurasia Daily Monitor Volume: 6 Issue: 218. The Jamestown Foundation. Retrieved 2 April 2010. 
  20. ^ "Estonian man on genocide charge". BBC News. 23 August 2007. Retrieved 2 April 2010. 
  21. ^
  22. ^

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.