World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

Article Id: WHEBN0000031663
Reproduction Date:

Title: Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: List of United States Supreme Court cases, County of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, Third Amendment to the United States Constitution, Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents, Preamble to the United States Constitution
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution

The Eleventh Amendment in the National Archives

The Eleventh Amendment (Amendment XI) to the U.S. 419 (1793).[1]

Text

The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

Background

The Eleventh Amendment was the first Constitutional amendment adopted after the U.S. 419 (1793). In Chisholm, the Court ruled that federal courts had the authority to hear cases in law and equity brought by private citizens against states and that states did not enjoy sovereign immunity from suits made by citizens of other states in federal court. Thus, the amendment clarified Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution, which gave diversity jurisdiction to the judiciary to hear cases "between a state and citizens of another state."

Proposal and ratification

The Eleventh Amendment was proposed by the 3rd Congress on March 4, 1794, when it was approved by the House of Representatives by vote of 81 – 9,[2] having been previously passed by the Senate, 23 – 2, on January 14.[3] The amendment was ratified by the state legislatures of the following states:[4]

  1. New York — March 27, 1794
  2. Rhode Island — March 31, 1794
  3. Connecticut — May 8, 1794
  4. New Hampshire — June 16, 1794
  5. Massachusetts — June 26, 1794
  6. Vermont — November 9, 1794
  7. Virginia — November 18, 1794
  8. Georgia — November 29, 1794
  9. Kentucky — December 7, 1794
  10. Maryland — December 26, 1794
  11. Delaware — January 23, 1795
  12. North Carolina — February 7, 1795
    Having been ratified by the requisite three–fourths of the several states, there being 15 States in the Union at the time, the ratification of the Eleventh Amendment was completed. It was subsequently ratified by:
  13. South Carolina — December 4, 1797

An official announcement of ratification was not made until January 8, 1798, when President John Adams in a message to Congress stated that the Eleventh Amendment had been adopted by the necessary number of States and that it may now be declared to be a part of the Constitution of the United States.[5] New Jersey and Pennsylvania did not take action on the amendment; neither did Tennessee, which had become a state on June 16, 1796.

Impact

In Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 U.S. 378 (1798), the Supreme Court held that every pending action brought under Chisholm had to be dismissed because of the amendment's adoption.[6]

The amendment's text does not mention suits brought against a state by its own citizens. However, in Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890), the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment reflects a broader principle of sovereign immunity. As Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing for a five Justice majority, stated in Alden v. Maine, 527 U.S. 706 (1999):
[S]overeign immunity derives not from the Eleventh Amendment but from the structure of the original Constitution itself....Nor can we conclude that the specific Article I powers delegated to Congress necessarily include, by virtue of the Necessary and Proper Clause or otherwise, the incidental authority to subject the States to private suits as a means of achieving objectives otherwise within the scope of the enumerated powers.[7]

Writing for a four-Justice dissent in Alden, Justice David Souter said the states surrendered their sovereign immunity when they ratified the Constitution. The dissenting justices read the amendment's text as reflecting a narrow form of sovereign immunity that limited only the diversity jurisdiction of the federal courts. They concluded that the states are not insulated from suits by individuals by either the Eleventh Amendment in particular or the Constitution in general.[8]

Although the Eleventh Amendment grants immunity to states from suit for money damages or equitable relief without their consent, in Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts may enjoin state officials from violating federal law. In Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445 (1976), the Supreme Court ruled that Congress may abrogate state immunity from suit under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. In Central Virginia Community College v. Katz, 546 U.S. 356 (2006), the Court ruled the Congress could do the same regarding bankruptcy cases by way of Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution. In Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga., 535 U.S. 613 (2002), the Supreme Court ruled that when a state invokes a federal court's removal jurisdiction, it waives the Eleventh Amendment in the removed case.

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has ruled that Puerto Rico enjoys Eleventh Amendment immunity.[9]

References

  1. ^ "Annotation 1 - Eleventh Amendment - State Immunity".  
  2. ^ "4 Annals of Congress 477 (1795)". Retrieved April 18, 2014. 
  3. ^ "4 Annals of Congress 30 (1795)". Retrieved April 18, 2014. 
  4. ^ "THE CONSTITUTION of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION, Centennial Edition, INTERIM EDITION: ANALYSIS OF CASES DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TO JUNE 26, 2013". Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. 2013. p. 42. Retrieved April 13, 2014. 
  5. ^ "7 Annals of Congress 809 (1798)". Retrieved April 18, 2014. 
  6. ^ Hollingsworth v. VirginiaOpinion of the Court in
  7. ^ Alden v. MaineOpinion of the Court in
  8. ^ Alden v. MaineDissenting opinion in
  9. ^ e.g., (1st Cir. 1983)Ramirez v. Puerto Rico Fire Service and Office of Personnel.

External links

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.