#jsDisabledContent { display:none; } My Account |  Register |  Help

# Fourier series

Article Id: WHEBN0000059038
Reproduction Date:

 Title: Fourier series Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia Language: English Subject: Collection: Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia Publication Date:

### Fourier series

Fourier transforms
Continuous Fourier transform
Fourier series
Discrete-time Fourier transform
Discrete Fourier transform
Fourier analysis
Related transforms

In mathematics, a Fourier series (English pronunciation: ) is a way to represent a wave-like function as the sum of simple sine waves. More formally, it decomposes any periodic function or periodic signal into the sum of a (possibly infinite) set of simple oscillating functions, namely sines and cosines (or, equivalently, complex exponentials). The Discrete-time Fourier transform is a periodic function, often defined in terms of a Fourier series. The Z-transform, another example of application, reduces to a Fourier series for the important case |z|=1. Fourier series are also central to the original proof of the Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem. The study of Fourier series is a branch of Fourier analysis.

 The first four partial sums of the Fourier series for a square wave

## History

The Fourier series is named in honour of Jean-Baptiste Joseph Fourier (1768–1830), who made important contributions to the study of trigonometric series, after preliminary investigations by Leonhard Euler, Jean le Rond d'Alembert, and Daniel Bernoulli.[nb 1] Fourier introduced the series for the purpose of solving the heat equation in a metal plate, publishing his initial results in his 1807 Mémoire sur la propagation de la chaleur dans les corps solides (Treatise on the propagation of heat in solid bodies), and publishing his Théorie analytique de la chaleur (Analytical theory of heat) in 1822. Early ideas of decomposing a periodic function into the sum of simple oscillating functions date back to the 3rd century BC, when ancient astronomers proposed an empiric model of planetary motions, based on deferents and epicycles.

The heat equation is a partial differential equation. Prior to Fourier's work, no solution to the heat equation was known in the general case, although particular solutions were known if the heat source behaved in a simple way, in particular, if the heat source was a sine or cosine wave. These simple solutions are now sometimes called eigensolutions. Fourier's idea was to model a complicated heat source as a superposition (or linear combination) of simple sine and cosine waves, and to write the solution as a superposition of the corresponding eigensolutions. This superposition or linear combination is called the Fourier series.

From a modern point of view, Fourier's results are somewhat informal, due to the lack of a precise notion of function and integral in the early nineteenth century. Later, Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet[1] and Bernhard Riemann[2][3][4] expressed Fourier's results with greater precision and formality.

Although the original motivation was to solve the heat equation, it later became obvious that the same techniques could be applied to a wide array of mathematical and physical problems, and especially those involving linear differential equations with constant coefficients, for which the eigensolutions are sinusoids. The Fourier series has many such applications in electrical engineering, vibration analysis, acoustics, optics, signal processing, image processing, quantum mechanics, econometrics,[5] thin-walled shell theory,[6] etc.

## Definition

In this section, s(x) denotes a function of the real variable x, and s is integrable on an interval [x0x0 + P], for real numbers x0 and P. We will attempt to represent  s  in that interval as an infinite sum, or series, of harmonically related sinusoidal functions. Outside the interval, the series is periodic with period P (frequency 1/P). It follows that if s also has that property, the approximation is valid on the entire real line. We can begin with a finite summation (or partial sum):

s_N(x) = \frac{A_0}{2} + \sum_{n=1}^N A_n\cdot \sin(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}+\phi_n), \quad \scriptstyle \text{for integer}\ N\ \ge\ 1.

s_N(x)  is a periodic function with period P.  Using the identities:

\sin(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}+\phi_n) \equiv \sin(\phi_n) \cos(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}) + \cos(\phi_n) \sin(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P})
\sin(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}+\phi_n) \equiv \text{Re}\left\{\frac{1}{i}\cdot e^{i \left(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}+\phi_n\right)}\right\} = \frac{1}{2i}\cdot e^{i \left(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}+\phi_n\right)} +\left(\frac{1}{2i}\cdot e^{i \left(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}+\phi_n\right)}\right)^*,
Function s(x) (in red) is a sum of six sine functions of different amplitudes and harmonically related frequencies. Their summation is called a Fourier series. The Fourier transform, S(f) (in blue), which depicts amplitude vs frequency, reveals the 6 frequencies and their amplitudes.

we can also write the function in these equivalent forms:

 \begin{align} s_N(x) &= \frac{a_0}{2} + \sum_{n=1}^N \left(\overbrace{a_n}^{A_n \sin(\phi_n)} \cos(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}) + \overbrace{b_n}^{A_n \cos(\phi_n)} \sin(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P})\right)\\ &= \sum_{n=-N}^N c_n\cdot e^{i \tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}}, \end{align}

where:

c_n \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \ \begin{cases} \frac{A_n}{2i} e^{i\phi_n} = \frac{1}{2}(a_n - i b_n) & \text{for } n > 0 \\ \frac{1}{2}a_0 & \text{for }n = 0\\ c_{|n|}^* & \text{for } n < 0. \end{cases}

When the coefficients (known as Fourier coefficients) are computed as follows:[7]

 a_n = \frac{2}{P}\int_{x_0}^{x_0+P} s(x)\cdot \cos(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P})\ dx b_n = \frac{2}{P}\int_{x_0}^{x_0+P} s(x)\cdot \sin(\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P})\ dx c_n = \frac{1}{P}\int_{x_0}^{x_0+P} s(x)\cdot e^{-i \tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}}\ dx,

s_N(x)  approximates \scriptstyle s(x)  on  \scriptstyle [x_0,\ x_0+P],  and the approximation improves as N → ∞. The infinite sum, \scriptstyle s_{\infty}(x),  is called the Fourier series representation of s.  In engineering applications, the Fourier series is generally presumed to converge everywhere except at discontinuities, since the functions encountered in engineering are more well behaved than the ones that mathematicians can provide as counter-examples to this presumption. In particular, the Fourier series converges absolutely and uniformly to s(x) whenever the derivative of s(x) (which may not exist everywhere) is square integrable.[8]  If a function is square-integrable on the interval [x0, x0+P], then the Fourier series converges to the function at almost every point. See Convergence of Fourier series. It is possible to define Fourier coefficients for more general functions or distributions, in such cases convergence in norm or weak convergence is usually of interest.

### Example 1: a simple Fourier series

Plot of a periodic identity function, a sawtooth wave
Animated plot of the first five successive partial Fourier series

We now use the formula above to give a Fourier series expansion of a very simple function. Consider a sawtooth wave

s(x) = \frac{x}{\pi}, \quad \mathrm{for } -\pi < x < \pi,
s(x + 2\pi k) = s(x), \quad \mathrm{for } -\infty < x < \infty \text{ and } k \in \mathbb{Z} .

In this case, the Fourier coefficients are given by

\begin{align} a_n &{} = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}s(x) \cos(nx)\,dx = 0, \quad n \ge 0. \\ b_n &{} = \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}s(x) \sin(nx)\, dx\\ &= -\frac{2}{\pi n}\cos(n\pi) + \frac{2}{\pi^2 n^2}\sin(n\pi)\\ &= \frac{2\,(-1)^{n+1}}{\pi n}, \quad n \ge 1.\end{align}

It can be proven that the Fourier series converges to s(x) at every point x where s is differentiable, and therefore:

\begin{align} s(x) &= \frac{a_0}{2} + \sum_{n=1}^\infty \left[a_n\cos\left(nx\right)+b_n\sin\left(nx\right)\right] \\ &=\frac{2}{\pi}\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} \sin(nx), \quad \mathrm{for} \quad x - \pi \notin 2 \pi \mathbf{Z}. \end{align}

(Eq.1)

When x = π, the Fourier series converges to 0, which is the half-sum of the left- and right-limit of s at x = π. This is a particular instance of the Dirichlet theorem for Fourier series.

Heat distribution in a metal plate, using Fourier's method

This example leads us to a solution to the Basel problem

### Example 2: Fourier's motivation

The Fourier series expansion of our function in example 1 looks much less simple than the formula s(x) = x/π, and so it is not immediately apparent why one would need this Fourier series. While there are many applications, we cite Fourier's motivation of solving the heat equation. For example, consider a metal plate in the shape of a square whose side measures π meters, with coordinates (xy) ∈ [0, π] × [0, π]. If there is no heat source within the plate, and if three of the four sides are held at 0 degrees Celsius, while the fourth side, given by y = π, is maintained at the temperature gradient T(xπ) = x degrees Celsius, for x in (0, π), then one can show that the stationary heat distribution (or the heat distribution after a long period of time has elapsed) is given by

T(x,y) = 2\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^{n+1}}{n} \sin(nx) {\sinh(ny) \over \sinh(n\pi)}.

Here, sinh is the hyperbolic sine function. This solution of the heat equation is obtained by multiplying each term of  Eq.1 by sinh(ny)/sinh(nπ). While our example function s(x) seems to have a needlessly complicated Fourier series, the heat distribution T(xy) is nontrivial. The function T cannot be written as a closed-form expression. This method of solving the heat problem was made possible by Fourier's work.

### Other applications

Another application of this Fourier series is to solve the Basel problem by using Parseval's theorem. The example generalizes and one may compute ζ(2n), for any positive integer n.

### Other common notations

The notation cn is inadequate for discussing the Fourier coefficients of several different functions. Therefore it is customarily replaced by a modified form of the function (s, in this case), such as \scriptstyle\hat{s} or S, and functional notation often replaces subscripting:

\begin{align} s_{\infty}(x) &= \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \hat{s}(n)\cdot e^{i\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}} \\ &= \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty S[n]\cdot e^{j\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}} &&\scriptstyle \text{common engineering notation} \end{align}

In engineering, particularly when the variable x represents time, the coefficient sequence is called a frequency domain representation. Square brackets are often used to emphasize that the domain of this function is a discrete set of frequencies.

Another commonly used frequency domain representation uses the Fourier series coefficients to modulate a Dirac comb:

S(f) \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \ \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty S[n]\cdot \delta \left(f-\frac{n}{P}\right),

where f represents a continuous frequency domain. When variable x has units of seconds, f has units of hertz. The "teeth" of the comb are spaced at multiples (i.e. harmonics) of 1/P, which is called the fundamental frequency.  \scriptstyle s_{\infty}(x)  can be recovered from this representation by an inverse Fourier transform:

\begin{align} \mathcal{F}^{-1}\{S(f)\} &= \int_{-\infty}^\infty \left( \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty S[n]\cdot \delta \left(f-\frac{n}{P}\right)\right) e^{i 2 \pi f x}\,df, \\ &= \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty S[n]\cdot \int_{-\infty}^\infty \delta\left(f-\frac{n}{P}\right) e^{i 2 \pi f x}\,df, \\ &= \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty S[n]\cdot e^{i\tfrac{2\pi nx}{P}} \ \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \ s_{\infty}(x). \end{align}

The constructed function S(f) is therefore commonly referred to as a Fourier transform, even though the Fourier integral of a periodic function is not convergent at the harmonic frequencies.[nb 2]

## Beginnings

This immediately gives any coefficient ak of the trigonometrical series for φ(y) for any function which has such an expansion. It works because if φ has such an expansion, then (under suitable convergence assumptions) the integral

\begin{align} a_k&=\int_{-1}^1\varphi(y)\cos(2k+1)\frac{\pi y}{2}\,dy \\ &= \int_{-1}^1\left(a\cos\frac{\pi y}{2}\cos(2k+1)\frac{\pi y}{2}+a'\cos 3\frac{\pi y}{2}\cos(2k+1)\frac{\pi y}{2}+\cdots\right)\,dy \end{align}

can be carried out term-by-term. But all terms involving \cos(2j+1)\frac{\pi y}{2} \cos(2k+1)\frac{\pi y}{2} for jk vanish when integrated from −1 to 1, leaving only the kth term.

In these few lines, which are close to the modern formalism used in Fourier series, Fourier revolutionized both mathematics and physics. Although similar trigonometric series were previously used by Euler, d'Alembert, Daniel Bernoulli and Gauss, Fourier believed that such trigonometric series could represent any arbitrary function. In what sense that is actually true is a somewhat subtle issue and the attempts over many years to clarify this idea have led to important discoveries in the theories of convergence, function spaces, and harmonic analysis.

When Fourier submitted a later competition essay in 1811, the committee (which included Lagrange, Laplace, Malus and Legendre, among others) concluded: ...the manner in which the author arrives at these equations is not exempt of difficulties and...his analysis to integrate them still leaves something to be desired on the score of generality and even rigour.

### Birth of harmonic analysis

Since Fourier's time, many different approaches to defining and understanding the concept of Fourier series have been discovered, all of which are consistent with one another, but each of which emphasizes different aspects of the topic. Some of the more powerful and elegant approaches are based on mathematical ideas and tools that were not available at the time Fourier completed his original work. Fourier originally defined the Fourier series for real-valued functions of real arguments, and using the sine and cosine functions as the basis set for the decomposition.

Many other Fourier-related transforms have since been defined, extending the initial idea to other applications. This general area of inquiry is now sometimes called harmonic analysis. A Fourier series, however, can be used only for periodic functions, or for functions on a bounded (compact) interval.

## Extensions

### Fourier series on a square

We can also define the Fourier series for functions of two variables x and y in the square [−π, π]×[−π, π]:

f(x,y) = \sum_{j,k \in \mathbf{Z}\text{ (integers)}} c_{j,k}e^{ijx}e^{iky},
c_{j,k} = {1 \over 4 \pi^2} \int_{-\pi}^\pi \int_{-\pi}^\pi f(x,y) e^{-ijx}e^{-iky}\, dx \, dy.

Aside from being useful for solving partial differential equations such as the heat equation, one notable application of Fourier series on the square is in image compression. In particular, the jpeg image compression standard uses the two-dimensional discrete cosine transform, which is a Fourier transform using the cosine basis functions.

### Fourier series of Bravais-lattice-periodic-function

The Bravais lattice is defined as the set of vectors of the form:

\mathbf{R} = n_{1}\mathbf{a}_{1} + n_{2}\mathbf{a}_{2} + n_{3}\mathbf{a}_{3}

where ni are integers and ai are three linearly independent vectors. Assuming we have some function, f(r), such that it obeys the following condition for any Bravais lattice vector R: f(r) = f(r + R), we could make a Fourier series of it. This kind of function can be, for example, the effective potential that one electron "feels" inside a periodic crystal. It is useful to make a Fourier series of the potential then when applying Bloch's theorem. First, we may write any arbitrary vector r in the coordinate-system of the lattice:

\mathbf{r} = x_1\frac{\mathbf{a}_{1}}{a_1}+ x_2\frac{\mathbf{a}_{2}}{a_2}+ x_3\frac{\mathbf{a}_{3}}{a_3},

where ai = |ai|.

Thus we can define a new function,

g(x_1,x_2,x_3) := f(\mathbf{r}) = f \left (x_1\frac{\mathbf{a}_{1}}{a_1}+x_2\frac{\mathbf{a}_{2}}{a_2}+x_3\frac{\mathbf{a}_{3}}{a_3} \right ).

This new function, g(x_1,x_2,x_3), is now a function of three-variables, each of which has periodicity a1, a2, a3 respectively: g(x_1,x_2,x_3) = g(x_1+a_1,x_2,x_3) = g(x_1,x_2+a_2,x_3) = g(x_1,x_2,x_3+a_3). If we write a series for g on the interval [0, a1] for x1, we can define the following:

h^\mathrm{one}(m_1, x_2, x_3) := \frac{1}{a_1}\int_0^{a_1} g(x_1, x_2, x_3)\cdot e^{-i 2\pi \frac{m_1}{a_1} x_1}\, dx_1

And then we can write:

g(x_1, x_2, x_3)=\sum_{m_1=-\infty}^\infty h^\mathrm{one}(m_1, x_2, x_3) \cdot e^{i 2\pi \frac{m_1}{a_1} x_1}

Further defining:

\begin{align} h^\mathrm{two}(m_1, m_2, x_3) & := \frac{1}{a_2}\int_0^{a_2} h^\mathrm{one}(m_1, x_2, x_3)\cdot e^{-i 2\pi \frac{m_2}{a_2} x_2}\, dx_2 \\[12pt] & = \frac{1}{a_2}\int_0^{a_2} dx_2 \frac{1}{a_1}\int_0^{a_1} dx_1 g(x_1, x_2, x_3)\cdot e^{-i 2\pi \left(\frac{m_1}{a_1} x_1+\frac{m_2}{a_2} x_2\right)} \end{align}

We can write g once again as:

g(x_1, x_2, x_3)=\sum_{m_1=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{m_2=-\infty}^\infty h^\mathrm{two}(m_1, m_2, x_3) \cdot e^{i 2\pi \frac{m_1}{a_1} x_1} \cdot e^{i 2\pi \frac{m_2} {a_2} x_2}

Finally applying the same for the third coordinate, we define:

\begin{align} h^\mathrm{three}(m_1, m_2, m_3) & := \frac{1}{a_3}\int_0^{a_3} h^\mathrm{two}(m_1, m_2, x_3)\cdot e^{-i 2\pi \frac{m_3}{a_3} x_3}\, dx_3 \\[12pt] & = \frac{1}{a_3}\int_0^{a_3} dx_3 \frac{1}{a_2}\int_0^{a_2} dx_2 \frac{1}{a_1}\int_0^{a_1} dx_1 g(x_1, x_2, x_3)\cdot e^{-i 2\pi \left(\frac{m_1}{a_1} x_1+\frac{m_2}{a_2} x_2 + \frac{m_3}{a_3} x_3\right)} \end{align}

We write g as:

g(x_1, x_2, x_3)=\sum_{m_1=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{m_2=-\infty}^\infty \sum_{m_3=-\infty}^\infty h^\mathrm{three}(m_1, m_2, m_3) \cdot e^{i 2\pi \frac{m_1}{a_1} x_1} \cdot e^{i 2\pi \frac{m_2}{a_2} x_2}\cdot e^{i 2\pi \frac{m_3}{a_3} x_3}

Re-arranging:

g(x_1, x_2, x_3)=\sum_{m_1, m_2, m_3 \in \Z } h^\mathrm{three}(m_1, m_2, m_3) \cdot e^{i 2\pi \left( \frac{m_1}{a_1} x_1+ \frac{m_2}{a_2} x_2 + \frac{m_3}{a_3} x_3\right)}.

Now, every reciprocal lattice vector can be written as \mathbf{K} = l_{1}\mathbf{g}_{1} + l_{2}\mathbf{g}_{2} + l_{3}\mathbf{g}_{3}, where li are integers and gi are the reciprocal lattice vectors, we can use the fact that \mathbf{g_i} \cdot \mathbf{a_j}=2\pi\delta_{ij} to calculate that for any arbitrary reciprocal lattice vector K and arbitrary vector in space r, their scalar product is:

\mathbf{K} \cdot \mathbf{r} = \left ( l_{1}\mathbf{g}_{1} + l_{2}\mathbf{g}_{2} + l_{3}\mathbf{g}_{3} \right ) \cdot \left (x_1\frac{\mathbf{a}_{1}}{a_1}+ x_2\frac{\mathbf{a}_{2}}{a_2} +x_3\frac{\mathbf{a}_{3}}{a_3} \right ) = 2\pi \left( x_1\frac{l_1}{a_1}+x_2\frac{l_2}{a_2}+x_3\frac{l_3}{a_3} \right ).

And so it is clear that in our expansion, the sum is actually over reciprocal lattice vectors:

f(\mathbf{r})=\sum_{\mathbf{K}} h(\mathbf{K}) \cdot e^{i \mathbf{K} \cdot \mathbf{r}},

where

h(\mathbf{K}) = \frac{1}{a_3}\int_0^{a_3} dx_3 \frac{1}{a_2}\int_0^{a_2} dx_2 \frac{1}{a_1}\int_0^{a_1} dx_1 f\left(x_1\frac{\mathbf{a}_{1}}{a_1}+x_2\frac{\mathbf{a}_{2}}{a_2}+x_3\frac{\mathbf{a}_{3}}{a_3} \right)\cdot e^{-i \mathbf{K} \cdot \mathbf{r}}.

Assuming

\mathbf{r} = (x,y,z) = x_1\frac{\mathbf{a}_{1}}{a_1}+x_2\frac{\mathbf{a}_{2}}{a_2}+x_3\frac{\mathbf{a}_{3}}{a_3},

we can solve this system of three linear equations for x, y, and z in terms of x1, x2 and x3 in order to calculate the volume element in the original cartesian coordinate system. Once we have x, y, and z in terms of x1, x2 and x3, we can calculate Jacobian determinant:

\begin{bmatrix} \dfrac{\partial x_1}{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial x_1}{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial x_1}{\partial z} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial x_2}{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial x_2}{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial x_2}{\partial z} \\[3pt] \dfrac{\partial x_3}{\partial x} & \dfrac{\partial x_3}{\partial y} & \dfrac{\partial x_3}{\partial z} \end{bmatrix}

which after some calculation and applying some non-trivial cross-product identities can be shown to be equal to:

\frac{a_1 a_2 a_3}{\mathbf{a_1}\cdot(\mathbf{a_2} \times \mathbf{a_3})}

(it may be advantageous for the sake of simplifying calculations, to work in such a cartesian coordinate system, in which it just so happens that a1 is parallel to the x axis, a2 lies in the x-y plane, and a3 has components of all three axes). The denominator is exactly the volume of the primitive unit cell which is enclosed by the three primitive-vectors a1, a2 and a3. In particular, we now know that

dx_1 \, dx_2 \, dx_3 = \frac{a_1 a_2 a_3}{\mathbf{a_1}\cdot(\mathbf{a_2} \times \mathbf{a_3})} \cdot dx \, dy \, dz.

We can write now h(K) as an integral with the traditional coordinate system over the volume of the primitive cell, instead of with the x1, x2 and x3 variables:

h(\mathbf{K}) = \frac{1}{\mathbf{a_1}\cdot(\mathbf{a_2} \times \mathbf{a_3})}\int_{C} d\mathbf{r} f(\mathbf{r})\cdot e^{-i \mathbf{K} \cdot \mathbf{r}}

And C is the primitive unit cell, thus, \mathbf{a_1}\cdot(\mathbf{a_2} \times \mathbf{a_3}) is the volume of the primitive unit cell.

### Hilbert space interpretation

In the language of Hilbert spaces, the set of functions {e_n=e^{2{\pi}inx}; nZ} is an orthonormal basis for the space L2([−π, π]) of square-integrable functions of [−π, π]. This space is actually a Hilbert space with an inner product given for any two elements f and g by

\langle f,\, g \rangle \;\stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \; \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x)\overline{g(x)}\,dx.

The basic Fourier series result for Hilbert spaces can be written as

f=\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \langle f,e_n \rangle \, e_n.
Sines and cosines form an orthonormal set, as illustrated above. The integral of sine, cosine and their product is zero (green and red areas are equal, and cancel out) when m, n or the functions are different, and pi only if m and n are equal, and the function used is the same.

This corresponds exactly to the complex exponential formulation given above. The version with sines and cosines is also justified with the Hilbert space interpretation. Indeed, the sines and cosines form an orthogonal set:

\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \cos(mx)\, \cos(nx)\, dx = \pi \delta_{mn}, \quad m, n \ge 1, \,
\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \sin(mx)\, \sin(nx)\, dx = \pi \delta_{mn}, \quad m, n \ge 1

(where δmn is the Kronecker delta), and

\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \cos(mx)\, \sin(nx)\, dx = 0;\,

furthermore, the sines and cosines are orthogonal to the constant function 1. An orthonormal basis for L2([−π, π]) consisting of real functions is formed by the functions 1/ 1 and 1/π cos(nx),  1/π sin(nx) with n = 1, 2,...  The density of their span is a consequence of the Stone–Weierstrass theorem, but follows also from the properties of classical kernels like the Fejér kernel.

## Properties

We say that f belongs to C^k(\mathbb{T}) if f is a 2π-periodic function on R which is k times differentiable, and its kth derivative is continuous.

• If f is a 2π-periodic odd function, then an = 0 for all n.
• If f is a 2π-periodic even function, then bn = 0 for all n.
• If f is integrable, \lim_{|n|\rightarrow \infty}\hat{f}(n)=0, \lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}a_n=0 and \lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty}b_n=0. This result is known as the Riemann–Lebesgue lemma.
• A doubly infinite sequence {an} in c0(Z) is the sequence of Fourier coefficients of a function in L1([0, 2π]) if and only if it is a convolution of two sequences in \ell^2(\mathbf{Z}). See [10]
• If f \in C^1(\mathbb{T}), then the Fourier coefficients \widehat{f'}(n) of the derivative f′ can be expressed in terms of the Fourier coefficients \hat{f}(n) of the function f, via the formula \widehat{f'}(n) = in \hat{f}(n).
• If f \in C^k(\mathbb{T}), then \widehat{f^{(k)}}(n) = (in)^k \hat{f}(n). In particular, since \widehat{f^{(k)}}(n) tends to zero, we have that |n|^k\hat{f}(n) tends to zero, which means that the Fourier coefficients converge to zero faster than the kth power of n.
• Parseval's theorem. If f belongs to L2([−π, π]), then \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty |\hat{f}(n)|^2 = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} |f(x)|^2 \, dx.
• Plancherel's theorem. If c_0,\, c_{\pm 1},\, c_{\pm 2},\ldots are coefficients and \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty |c_n|^2 < \infty then there is a unique function f\in L^2([-\pi,\pi]) such that \hat{f}(n) = c_n for every n.
• The first convolution theorem states that if f and g are in L1([−π, π]), the Fourier series coefficients of the 2π-periodic convolution of f and g are given by:
[\widehat{f*_{2\pi}g}](n) = 2\pi\cdot \hat{f}(n)\cdot\hat{g}(n),[nb 4]
where:
\begin{align} \left[f*_{2\pi}g\right](x) \ &\stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(u)\cdot g[\text{pv}(x-u)] du, && \big(\text{and }\underbrace{\text{pv}(x) \ \stackrel{\mathrm{def}}{=} \text{Arg}\left(e^{ix}\right) }_{\text{principal value}}\big)\\ &= \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(u)\cdot g(x-u)\, du, &&\scriptstyle \text{when g(x) is 2}\pi\text{-periodic.}\\ &= \int_{2\pi} f(u)\cdot g(x-u)\, du, &&\scriptstyle \text{when both functions are 2}\pi\text{-periodic, and the integral is over any 2}\pi\text{ interval.} \end{align}
• The second convolution theorem states that the Fourier series coefficients of the product of f and g are given by the discrete convolution of the \hat f and \hat g sequences:
[\widehat{f\cdot g}](n) = [\hat{f}*\hat{g}](n).

### Compact groups

One of the interesting properties of the Fourier transform which we have mentioned, is that it carries convolutions to pointwise products. If that is the property which we seek to preserve, one can produce Fourier series on any compact group. Typical examples include those classical groups that are compact. This generalizes the Fourier transform to all spaces of the form L2(G), where G is a compact group, in such a way that the Fourier transform carries convolutions to pointwise products. The Fourier series exists and converges in similar ways to the [−π, π] case.

An alternative extension to compact groups is the Peter–Weyl theorem, which proves results about representations of compact groups analogous to those about finite groups.

### Riemannian manifolds

The atomic orbitals of chemistry are spherical harmonics and can be used to produce Fourier series on the sphere.

If the domain is not a group, then there is no intrinsically defined convolution. However, if X is a compact Riemannian manifold, it has a Laplace–Beltrami operator. The Laplace–Beltrami operator is the differential operator that corresponds to Laplace operator for the Riemannian manifold X. Then, by analogy, one can consider heat equations on X. Since Fourier arrived at his basis by attempting to solve the heat equation, the natural generalization is to use the eigensolutions of the Laplace–Beltrami operator as a basis. This generalizes Fourier series to spaces of the type L2(X), where X is a Riemannian manifold. The Fourier series converges in ways similar to the [−π, π] case. A typical example is to take X to be the sphere with the usual metric, in which case the Fourier basis consists of spherical harmonics.

### Locally compact Abelian groups

The generalization to compact groups discussed above does not generalize to noncompact, nonabelian groups. However, there is a straightfoward generalization to Locally Compact Abelian (LCA) groups.

This generalizes the Fourier transform to L1(G) or L2(G), where G is an LCA group. If G is compact, one also obtains a Fourier series, which converges similarly to the [−π, π] case, but if G is noncompact, one obtains instead a Fourier integral. This generalization yields the usual Fourier transform when the underlying locally compact Abelian group is R.

## Approximation and convergence of Fourier series

An important question for the theory as well as applications is that of convergence. In particular, it is often necessary in applications to replace the infinite series \sum_{-\infty}^\infty  by a finite one,

f_N(x) = \sum_{n=-N}^N \hat{f}(n) e^{inx}.

This is called a partial sum. We would like to know, in which sense does fN(x) converge to f(x) as N → ∞.

### Least squares property

We say that p is a trigonometric polynomial of degree N when it is of the form

p(x)=\sum_{n=-N}^N p_n e^{inx}.

Note that fN is a trigonometric polynomial of degree N. Parseval's theorem implies that

Theorem. The trigonometric polynomial fN is the unique best trigonometric polynomial of degree N approximating f(x), in the sense that, for any trigonometric polynomial p fN of degree N, we have
\|f_N - f\|_2 < \|p - f\|_2,
where the Hilbert space norm is defined as:
\| g \|_2 = \sqrt{{1 \over 2\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} |g(x)|^2 \, dx}.

### Convergence

Because of the least squares property, and because of the completeness of the Fourier basis, we obtain an elementary convergence result.

Theorem. If f belongs to L2([−π, π]), then f converges to f in L2([−π, π]), that is,  \|f_N - f\|_2 converges to 0 as N → ∞.

We have already mentioned that if f is continuously differentiable, then  (i\cdot n) \hat{f}(n)  is the nth Fourier coefficient of the derivative f′. It follows, essentially from the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality, that f is absolutely summable. The sum of this series is a continuous function, equal to f, since the Fourier series converges in the mean to f:

Theorem. If f \in C^1(\mathbb{T}), then f converges to f uniformly (and hence also pointwise.)

This result can be proven easily if f is further assumed to be C2, since in that case n^2\hat{f}(n) tends to zero as n → ∞. More generally, the Fourier series is absolutely summable, thus converges uniformly to f, provided that f satisfies a Hölder condition of order α > ½. In the absolutely summable case, the inequality \sup_x |f(x) - f_N(x)| \le \sum_{|n| > N} |\hat{f}(n)|  proves uniform convergence.

Many other results concerning the convergence of Fourier series are known, ranging from the moderately simple result that the series converges at x if f is differentiable at x, to Lennart Carleson's much more sophisticated result that the Fourier series of an L2 function actually converges almost everywhere.

These theorems, and informal variations of them that don't specify the convergence conditions, are sometimes referred to generically as "Fourier's theorem" or "the Fourier theorem".[11][12][13][14]

### Divergence

Since Fourier series have such good convergence properties, many are often surprised by some of the negative results. For example, the Fourier series of a continuous T-periodic function need not converge pointwise. The uniform boundedness principle yields a simple non-constructive proof of this fact.

In 1922, Andrey Kolmogorov published an article entitled "Une série de Fourier-Lebesgue divergente presque partout" in which he gave an example of a Lebesgue-integrable function whose Fourier series diverges almost everywhere. He later constructed an example of an integrable function whose Fourier series diverges everywhere (Katznelson 1976).

## Notes

1. ^ These three did some important early work on the wave equation, especially D'Alembert. Euler's work in this area was mostly comtemporaneous/ in collaboration with Bernoulli, although the latter made some independent contributions to the theory of waves and vibrations (see here, pg.s 209 & 210, ).
2. ^ Since the integral defining the Fourier transform of a periodic function is not convergent, it is necessary to view the periodic function and its transform as distributions. In this sense \mathcal{F} \left\{ e^{i \frac{2\pi nx}{P} } \right\} is a Dirac delta function, which is an example of a distribution.
3. ^ These words are not strictly Fourier's. Whilst the cited article does list the author as Fourier, a footnote indicates that the article was actually written by Poisson (that it was not written by Fourier is also clear from the consistent use of the third person to refer to him) and that it is, "for reasons of historical interest", presented as though it were Fourier's original memoire.
4. ^ The scale factor is always equal to the period, 2π in this case.

## References

1. ^ Lejeune-Dirichlet, P. "Sur la convergence des séries trigonométriques qui servent à représenter une fonction arbitraire entre des limites données". (In French), transl. "On the convergence of trigonometric series which serve to represent an arbitrary function between two given limits". Journal f¨ur die reine und angewandte Mathematik, Vol. 4 (1829) pp. 157–169.
2. ^ "Ueber die Darstellbarkeit einer Function durch eine trigonometrische Reihe" [About the representability of a function by a trigonometric series].
3. ^ D. Mascre, Bernhard Riemann: Posthumous Thesis on the Representation of Functions by Triginometric Series (1867). Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics 1640–1940, Ivor Grattan-Guinness (ed.); pg. 492. Elsevier, 20 May 2005.Accessed 7 Dec 2012.
4. ^ Theory of Complex Functions: Readings in Mathematics, by Reinhold Remmert; pg 29. Springer, 1991. Accessed 7 Dec 2012.
5. ^ Nerlove, Marc; Grether, David M.; Carvalho, Jose L. (1995). Analysis of Economic Time Series. Economic Theory, Econometrics, and Mathematical Economics. Elsevier.
6. ^ Flugge, Wilhelm (1957). Statik und Dynamik der Schalen. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. ^ Dorf, Richard C.; Tallarida, Ronald J. (1993-07-15). Pocket Book of Electrical Engineering Formulas (1 ed.). Boca Raton,FL: CRC Press. pp. 171–174.
8. ^ Georgi P. Tolstov (1976). Fourier Series. Courier-Dover.
9. ^ "Gallica – Fourier, Jean-Baptiste-Joseph (1768–1830). Oeuvres de Fourier. 1888, pp. 218–219" (in Français). Gallica.bnf.fr. 2007-10-15. Retrieved 2014-08-08.
10. ^ "fa.functional analysis - Characterizations of a linear subspace associated with Fourier series". MathOverflow. 2010-11-19. Retrieved 2014-08-08.
11. ^ William McC. Siebert (1985). Circuits, signals, and systems. MIT Press. p. 402.
12. ^ L. Marton and Claire Marton (1990). Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics. Academic Press. p. 369.
13. ^ Hans Kuzmany (1998). Solid-state spectroscopy. Springer. p. 14.
14. ^ Karl H. Pribram, Kunio Yasue, and Mari Jibu (1991). Brain and perception. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 26.