World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Heathenry (new religious movement)

Article Id: WHEBN0002527797
Reproduction Date:

Title: Heathenry (new religious movement)  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: New Religious Movements, Viking metal, Church of All Worlds, Goddess movement, Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive900
Collection: Germanic Neopaganism, Neopagan Traditions, New Religious Movements
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Heathenry (new religious movement)

A modern reconstruction of a historical Viking Age pendant worn by North Germanic pagans in the Viking Age—Mjölnir, the hammer of the god Thor—now popularly worn in modern Germanic Neopaganism

Heathenry, also termed Heathenism or Germanic Neopaganism, is a contemporary Pagan new religious movement whose practitioners seek to imitate the pre-Christian religions adhered to by the Germanic peoples of Iron Age and Early Medieval Europe, using surviving historical, archaeological, and folkloric evidence as a basis.[1] Germanic Neopagan approaches to this material vary considerably, ranging from strictly historical polytheistic reconstructionism to more syncretistic interpretations. Heathen communities are currently present in various parts of Europe, the Americas, and Australasia.

Although it lacks a unified theology, Heathenry is a typically polytheistic religion, centered around a pantheon of deities from pre-Christian Germanic Europe. It adopts the cosmological views that were described in various historical sources, including an animistic view of the cosmos in which the natural world is imbued with spirits. The faith's gods and goddesses are honored in sacrificial rites known as Blóts, which are often accompanied by Symbel, the act of ceremonially toasting the gods with an alcoholic beverage. The Heathen community assembles in small groups, usually known as kindreds or hearths, who often perform their rites in specially constructed buildings or outdoors. Some practitioners also engage in rituals designed to induce altered states of consciousness and visions, most notably Seiðr and Galdr, with the intent of gaining wisdom and advice from the deities. Heathen ethical systems place great emphasis on honor, personal integrity, and loyalty.

The primary division within the Heathen movement surrounds the issue of race. Many groups eschew racialist ideas, adopting a universalist perspective which holds that the religion is open to all, irrespective of ethnic or racial identity. Conversely, other groups adopt a racialist attitude – termed "folkish" within the community – by viewing Heathenry as a religion with intrinsic links to a Nordic race that should be reserved explicitly for white individuals; some folkish Heathens further combine the religion with explicitly racist and white supremacist perspectives. Although the term "Heathenry" is used widely to describe the religion as a whole, many groups prefer different forms of designation, influenced by their regional focus and their attitude to race; while many groups venerating Scandinavian deities use Ásatrú or Forn Sed, those focusing on Anglo-Saxon deities use Theodism, and those adopting folkish perspectives tend to favor the terms Odinism and Wotanism.

The religion's origins lie in the 19th and early 20th century romanticist movements that glorified the pre-Christian beliefs of Germanic societies. Organised groups venerating the Germanic gods developed in Germany, Austria, and Australia, which typically exhibited a racialist interpretation of the religion, resulting in the movement largely dissolving following the defeat of Nazi Germany in the Second World War. In the 1970s, new Heathen organisations emerged in Europe and North America. In recent decades, the Heathen movement has been the subject of academic study by scholars active in the field of Pagan studies.


  • Definition 1
    • Terminology 1.1
  • Beliefs 2
    • The gods and spirits 2.1
    • Cosmology and afterlife 2.2
    • Morality and ethics 2.3
  • Rites and practices 3
    • Blót and sumbel 3.1
    • Seiðr and Galdr 3.2
    • Festivals 3.3
  • Racial issues 4
  • History 5
    • Romanticism and the Völkisch movement 5.1
    • Modern development 5.2
  • Demographics 6
    • North America 6.1
    • Europe 6.2
  • See also 7
  • References 8
    • Notes 8.1
    • Footnotes 8.2
    • Sources 8.3


Outdoor temporary altar of the Swedish Forn Sed Association.

Classified as a new religious movement by scholars of religious studies,[1] Heathenry is largely a reconstructionist form of contemporary Paganism.[2] A "movement to revive and/or reinterpret for the present day the practices and worldviews of the pre-Christian cultures of northern Europe (or, more particularly, the Germanic speaking cultures)",[3] its practitioners seek to revive these past religions using surviving historical source materials.[4] Sources used by Heathens include Scandinavian and Icelandic Old Norse texts like the Prose Edda and the Poetic Edda, as well as texts from continental Europe like the Nibelungenlied and Anglo-Saxon sources like Beowulf. Some also make use of folk tales from later periods in European history, as well as taking ideas from archaeological evidence.[5] These sources are often fragmentary and composed within Christian contexts, thus making it problematic for Heathens seeking to use them to "reconstruct" the pre-Christian prehistoric and medieval belief systems which they discuss.[6] Thus, anthropologist Jenny Blain characterised Heathenry as "a religion constructed from partial material",[7] while religious studies scholar Michael Strmiska referred to it as a "postmodern movement" whose beliefs are "riddled with uncertainty and historical confusion".[8]

The ways in which Heathens use this historical and archaeological material differs; some seek to reconstruct historic beliefs and practices as accurately as possible, while others openly experiment with this material and embrace new ideas.[9] Some for instance accept what is termed "unverified personal gnosis" (UPG) that they have gained through spiritual experiences.[10] Others adopt concepts from the world's surviving indigenous religions as well as modern polytheistic faiths such as Hinduism and Afro-American religions, believing that doing so helps to construct spiritual world-views that are akin to those that existed in Europe prior to Christianization.[11] Some other practitioners who emphasize a hard reconstructionist approach that relies exclusively on historical and archaeological sources criticize such approaches, denigrating those who practice them using the pejorative term Neo-Heathen.[12]

Some Heathen groups seek out common elements that were found throughout Germanic Northern Europe during the Iron Age and Early Medieval periods, using those as the basis for their contemporary beliefs and practices.[13] Conversely, other groups focus on closely imitating the beliefs and practices of a specific area and time, such as Anglo-Saxon England or Viking Age Iceland.[13] Some adherents are deeply knowledgeable as to the specifics of Northern European society in the Iron Age and Early Medieval periods,[14] but others often express a romanticized view of Nordic culture,[15] with historian Ethan Doyle White highlighting examples in which Heathens "perpetuate misconceptions about the past".[16] Sociologist of religion Jennifer Snook for instance noted that many practitioners "hearken back to a more epic, anachronistic, and pure age of ancestors and heroes".[17] As religious studies scholar Fredrik Gregorius stated, despite the fact that "no real continuity" exists between Heathenry and the pre-Christian belief systems of Germanic Europe, Heathen practitioners often dislike being considered adherents of a "new religion" and "modern invention" and thus prefer to depict theirs as a "traditional faith".[18] Many practitioners avoid using the etic term "reconstructionism" to describe their practices,[19] preferring to characterize it as an "indigenous religion" with parallels to the traditional belief systems of the world's indigenous peoples.[20]


With no central authority existing to impose a particular terminological designation on all practitioners,[21] different terms have been used by different Germanic-oriented Pagan groups to describe their religion, often reflecting differences in "their region of ancient origin in northern Europe, in their structure, and often in their sociopolitical leanings."[22]

Icelandic Heathen rite at Sigurblót 2009

Academics studying the religion have typically favoured the terms Heathenry and Heathenism to describe it,[23] because these terms are "inclusive of all varieties" of the movement.[24] This term is the most commonly used option by practitioners in the United Kingdom,[25] with growing usage in North America and elsewhere.[26] These terms are based on the Early Medieval word heathen, which was used by Christian writers to describe non-Christians in Germanic Europe, with modern practitioners reclaiming it as a term for self-designation.[27] Many practitioners favor the term Heathen over Pagan because the former term originated among Germanic languages, whereas Pagan has its origins in Latin.[28]

Alternately, Blain suggested the use of North European Paganism as an overarching etic term for the movement,[29] although Strmiska noted that this term would also encompass those practitioners reviving the belief systems of ancient Finnic and Slavic societies in Northeastern Europe.[30] He favored Modern Nordic Paganism, although accepted that this term alienated those focusing on Anglo-Saxon and continental Germanic belief systems.[30]

Another name for the faith is the Icelandic term Ásatrú, which is more commonly rendered as Asatru in North America; this term translates as "allegiance to the Aesir" – the latter being a sub-set of deities in Norse mythology – with practitioners being known as Asatruer.[31] Although initially a popular term of self-designation, usage of Ásatrú has declined as the religion has aged, particularly in Scandinavia.[32] This term is favored by practitioners who focus on the deities of Scandinavia,[33] although is problematic as many Asatruer worship deities and entities other than the Aesir, such as the Vanir, Valkyries, Elves, and Dwarves.[34] Other practitioners term their religion Vanatrú, meaning "those who honor the Vanir" or Dísitrú, meaning "those who honor the goddesses", depending on their particular theological emphasis.[35] Although restricted especially to Scandinavia, since the mid-2000s a term that has grown in popularity is Forn Siðr or Forn Sed ("the old way"), which had previously been used in a derogatory sense to describe pre-Christian religion in the Old Norse Heimskringla.[36] Other terms used within the community to describe their religion are the Northern Tradition, Norse Paganism, and Saxon Paganism.[37]

Many racialist-oriented Heathens prefer the terms Odinism or Wotanism to describe their religion.[38] There is thus a general view that those who use Odinism adopt an explicitly political, right-wing and racialist interpretation of the religion, while Asatru is used by more moderate Heathen groups,[39] however no such neat division of the usage of such terms exists in practice.[40]


The gods and spirits

Many followers of Germanic Neopaganism venerate the Æsir, deities found in Norse mythology. Here, they are pictured gathered around the body of Baldur. Painting by Christoffer Wilhelm Eckersberg, 1817

The historian of religion Mattias Gardell noted that there is "no unanimously accepted theology" within the Heathen movement.[41] Typically, it is polytheistic, exhibiting a theological structure which includes a pantheon of gods and goddesses, with adherents offering their allegiance and worship to some or all of them.[42] Most practitioners are polytheistic realists, believing in the literal existence of the deities as individual entities.[43] Others express a psychological interpretation of the divinities, viewing them for instance as symbols, Jungian archetypes or racial archetypes,[44] with some who adopt this position deeming themselves to be atheists.[45]

Heathenry's deities are adopted from the pre-Christian belief systems found in the various societies of Germanic Europe; they include divinities like Tyr, Odin, Thor, Frigg and Freyja from Scandinavian sources, Wōden, Thunor and Ēostre from Anglo-Saxon sources, and figures such as Nehalennia from continental sources.[13] Some practitioners adopt the belief, taken from Norse mythology, that there are two sets of deities, the Æsir and the Vanir.[46] Certain practitioners blend the different regions and times together, for instance using a mix of Old English and Old Norse names for the deities, while others keep them separate and only venerate deities from a particular region.[47] Some groups focus their veneration on a particular deity, for instance the Brotherhood of Wolves, a Czech Heathen group, center their worship on the deity Fenris.[48] Similarly, many practitioners in the U.S. adopt a particular patron deity for themselves, and describe themselves as that entity's devotee using terms such as Thorsman or Odinsman.[49]

Heathen deities are not seen as perfect, omnipotent, and omnipresent, and are instead viewed as having their own strengths and weaknesses,[50] with many practitioners believing that these deities will one day die, as for instance the god Balder did in Norse mythology.[51] Heathens view their connection with their deities as not being that of a master and supplicant servant but rather an interdependent relationship akin to that of a family,[52] while for practitioners, these deities serve as both examples and role models whose behavior is to be imitated.[53] Many practitioners believe that they can communicate with these deities,[54] as well as negotiate, bargain, and argue with them,[55] and it is hoped that through venerating them, practitioners will gain wisdom, understanding, power, or visionary insights.[56]

Many practitioners combine their polytheistic world-view with a pantheistic conception of the natural world as being sacred and imbued with a divine energy force permeating all life.[57] Heathenry is animistic,[47] with practitioners believing in sentient non-human entities commonly known as wights that inhabit the world,[58] each of whom is believed to have its own personality.[13] Some of these are known as landvaettir or land spirits and inhabit different aspects of the landscape, living alongside humans, whom they can both help and hinder.[59] Others are deemed to be house wights and live within the home, where they can be propitiated with offerings of food.[60] Some Heathens interact with these entities, and provide offerings to them, more often than they do with the gods and goddesses.[61] Wights are often identified with various creatures from Northwest European folklore such as elves, dwarfs, gnomes, and trolls.[62] However, some of these entities – such as the Jotun of Norse mythology – are deemed to be baleful wights; within the community it is often deemed taboo to provide offerings to them, although some practitioners still do so.[63] Germanic Neopagans also believe in and respect ancestral spirits.[64]

Cosmology and afterlife

Heathens commonly adopt a cosmology based in Norse mythology in which our world – known as Midgard – is one of nine realms, all of which are part of a cosmological world tree called Yggdrasil. Each of these worlds is believed to be inhabited by another type of being; humans live on Midgard, while dwarves live on another realm, elves on another, giants on another, and the divinities live on two further realms.[65] Most practitioners believe that this is a poetic or symbolic description of the cosmos, with the different realms representing higher realms beyond the material plane of existence.[66] The World Tree is also interpreted by some in the community as an icon for ecological and social engagement.[56] Some Heathens, such as Brian Bates, have adopted an approach to this cosmology rooted in analytical psychology, thereby interpreting the nine worlds and their inhabitants as maps of the human mind.[56]

Heathen cemetery in Gufuneskirkjugarður, Reykjavík, which was established in 1999

According to a common Heathen belief based on references in Old Norse sources, three sisters known as the Norns sit at the end of the World Tree's root. These figures spin Wyrd, which refers to the actions and interrelationships of all beings throughout the cosmos.[67] In the community, these three figures are sometimes termed "Past, Present and Future", "Being, Becoming, and Obligation" or "Initiation, Becoming, Unfolding".[68] It is believed that an individual can navigate through the Wyrd, and thus, the Heathen worldview oscillates between concepts of free will and fatalism.[69] Heathens also believe in a personal form of Wyrd known as örlög.[70] This is connected to an emphasis on luck, with Heathens in the U.S. often believing that luck can be earned, passed down generations, or lost.[71]

Various Heathen groups adopt the Norse apocalyptic myth of Ragnarök, however few view it as a literal prophecy of future events.[72] Instead it is often treated as a symbolic warning of the danger that humanity faces if it acts unwisely in relation to both itself and the natural world.[72] The death of the gods at Ragnarok is often viewed as a reminder of the inevitability of death and the importance of living honourably and with integrity until one dies.[73] Alternately, ethnonationalist Heathens have interpreted Ragnarok as a prophecy of a coming apocalypse in which the white race will overthrow what these Heathens perceive as their oppressors and establish a future society based on Heathen religion.[74] Political scientist Jeffrey Kaplan believed that it was the "strongly millenarian and chialistic overtones" of Ragnarok which helped convert American racialists to the right-wing end of the Heathen movement.[75]

Some practitioners do not emphasize belief in an afterlife, instead stressing the importance of behaviour and reputation in this world.[76] In Icelandic Ásatrú, there is no singular dogmatic belief about the afterlife.[77] A common Heathen belief is that a human being has multiple souls, which are separate yet linked together.[78] It is common to find a belief in four or five souls, two of which survive bodily death: one of these, the hugh, travels to the realm of the ancestors, while the other, the fetch, undergoes a process of reincarnation into a new body.[79] In Heathen belief, there are various realms that the hugh; can enter, based in part on the worth of the individual's earthly life; these include the hall of Valhalla, ruled over by Odin, or Sessrumnir, the hall of Freya.[79] Beliefs regarding reincarnation vary widely among Heathens, although one common belief is that individuals are reborn within their family or clan.[79]

Morality and ethics

Heathen blót in Humlamaden near Veberöd in Lund, Sweden, June 2011

In Heathenry, moral and ethical views are based on the perceived ethics of Iron Age and Early Medieval North-West Europe,[80] in particular the actions of heroic figures who appear in Old Norse sagas.[81] Evoking a life-affirming ethos,[82] Heathen ethics focus on the ideals of honor, courage, integrity, hospitality, hard-work, and strongly emphasize loyalty to family.[83] It is common for practitioners to be expected to keep their word, particularly sworn oaths, and to take personal responsibility for their actions.[84] A common motto within the Heathen community is that "We are our deeds".[85]

In North America and elsewhere, some Heathen communities have formalized such values into an ethical code, the Nine Noble Virtues (NNV), which is based largely on the Hávamál from the Poetic Edda.[86] There are different forms of the NNV, with the number nine having symbolic associations in Norse mythology.[87] There is a divided opinion on the NNV; some practitioners deem them too dogmatic,[87] while others eschew them for not having authentic roots in historical Germanic culture,[88] negatively viewing them as an attempt to imitate the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments.[88] The NNV are not universal among Heathens, and it has for instance been noted that they are rare among Swedish practitioners.[89]

Due to its focus on family ties and honest living – values perceived as socially conservative in Western nations – it has been noted that American Heathenry's ethical system is far closer to traditional Christian morals than the ethical systems espoused in many other Western Pagan religions such as Wicca.[90] Within the Heathen community of the United States, gender roles are based upon perceived ideals and norms found in Early Medieval Northwestern Europe, in particular as they are presented in Old Norse sources.[91] Among male American Heathens there is a trend toward hypermasculanized behavior,[92] while a gendered division of labor – in which men are viewed as providers and women seen as being responsible for home and children – is also widespread among Heathens in the U.S.[93]

Sociologist Jennifer Snook noted that as with all religions, Heathenry was "intimately connected" to politics, with practitioners' political and religious beliefs influencing one another.[94] As a result of the religion's emphasis on honoring the land and its wights, many Heathens take an interest in

Asbjørn Jøn, A. (1999). "'Skeggøld, Skálmöld; Vindöld, Vergöld': Alexander Rud Mills and the Ásatrú Faith in the New Age". Australian Religion Studies Review 12 (1): 77–83. 
Asprem, Egil (2008). "Heathens Up North: Politics, Polemics, and Contemporary Paganism in Norway". The Pomegranate: The International Journal of Pagan Studies 10 (1): 42–69.  
Amster, Matthew H. (2015). "It's Not Easy Being Apolitical: Reconstructionism and Eclecticism in Danish Asatro". Contemporary Pagan and Native Faith Movements in Europe: Colonialist and Nationalist Impulses. Kathryn Rountree (ed.). New York and Oxford: Berghahn. pp. 43–63.  
Berger, Helen A.; Leagh, Evan A.; Shaffer, Leigh S. (2003). Voices from the Pagan Census: A National Survey of Witches and Neo-Pagans in the United States. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press.  
Blain, Jenny (2002). Nine Worlds of Seidr-Magic: Ecstasy and Neo-Shamanism in North European Paganism. London: Routledge.  
Blain, Jenny (2005). "Heathenry, the Past, and Sacred Sites in Today's Britain". In Strmiska, Michael F. Modern Paganism in World Cultures. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. pp. 181–208.  
Blain, Jenny; Wallis, Robert (2007). Sacred Sites, Contested Rites/Rights: Pagans Engagements with Archaeological Monuments. Eastbourne: Sussex Academic Press.  
Davy, Barbara Jane (2007). Introduction to Pagan Studies. Lanham: AltaMira.  
Doyle White, Ethan (2014). "The Goddess Frig: Reassessing an Anglo-Saxon Deity". Preternature: Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural 3 (2): 284–310.  
Gardell, Matthias (2003). Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.  
Goodrick-Clarke, Nicholas (2003). Black Sun: Aryan Cults, Esoteric Nazism, and the Politics of Identity. New York: New York University Press.  
Goodrick-Clarke, Nicholas (2004) [1985]. The Occult Roots of Nazism: Secret Aryan Cults and Their Influence on Nazi Ideology. New York: Tauris Parke.  
Granholm, Kennet (2011). ""Sons of Northern Darkness": Heathen Influences in Black Metal and Neofolk Music". Numen 58: 514–544.  
Gregorius, Fredrik (2015). "Modern Heathenism in Sweden: A Case Study in the Creation of a Traditional Religion". Contemporary Pagan and Native Faith Movements in Europe: Colonialist and Nationalist Impulses. Kathryn Rountree (ed.). New York and Oxford: Berghahn. pp. 64–85.  
Harvey, Graham (1995). "Heathenism: A North European Pagan Tradition". Paganism Today. Graham Harvey and Charlotte Hardman (eds). London: Thorsons. pp. 49–64.  
Harvey, Graham (2007). Listening People, Speaking Earth: Contemporary Paganism (second ed.). London: Hurst & Company.  
Horrell, Thad N. (2012). "Heathenry as a Postcolonial Movement". The Journal of Religion, Identity, and Politics 1 (1): 1–14. 
Hunt-Anschutz, Arlea (2002). "Heathenry". In S. Rabinovitch and J. Lewis. The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism. New York: Citadel Press. pp. 126–127.  
Kaplan, Jeffrey (1996). "The Reconstruction of the Ásatrú and Odinist Traditions". In Lewis, James R. (ed.). Magical Religion and Modern Witchcraft. New York: State University of New York. pp. 193–236.  
Kaplan, Jeffrey (1997). Radical Religion in America: Millenarian Movements from the Far Right to the Children of Noah. Syracuse: Syracuse Academic Press.  
Lindquist, Galina (1997). Shamanic Performances on the Urban Scene: Neo-Shamanism in Contemporary Sweden. Stockholm: Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology.  
Magliocco, Sabina (2004). Witching Culture: Folklore and Neo-Paganism in America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.  
Paxson, Diana (2002). "Asatru in the United States". In S. Rabinovitch and J. Lewis. The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism. New York: Citadel Press. pp. 17–18.  
Pizza, Murphy (2014). Paganistan: Contemporary Pagan Community in Minnesota's Twin Cities. Farnham: Ashgate.  
Snook, Jennifer (2015). American Heathens: The Politics of Identity in a Pagan Religious Movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.  
Strmiska, Michael F. (2000). "Ásatrú in Iceland: The Rebirth of Nordic Paganism". Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternate and Emergent Religions 4 (1): 106–132.  
Strmiska, Michael (2002). "Asatru in Iceland". In S. Rabinovitch and J. Lewis. The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism. New York: Citadel Press. pp. 15–17.  
Strmiska, Michael F. (2007). "Putting the Blood Back into Blót: The Revival of Animal Sacrifice in Modern Nordic Paganism". The Pomegranate: The International Journal of Pagan Studies 9 (2). pp. 154–189. 
Strmiska, Michael F.; Sigurvinsson, Baldur A. (2005). "Asatru: Nordic Paganism in Iceland and America". In Strmiska, Michael F. Modern Paganism in World Cultures. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. pp. 127–179.  
Velkoborská, Kamila (2015). "The Brotherhood of Wolves in the Czech Republic: From Ásatrú to Primitivism". Contemporary Pagan and Native Faith Movements in Europe: Colonialist and Nationalist Impulses. Kathryn Rountree (ed.). New York and Oxford: Berghahn. pp. 86–109.  
Williams, Thomas (2012). "A Blaze in the Northern Sky: Black Metal and Crimes Against Culture". Public Archaeology 11 (2).  
York, Michael (1995). The Emerging Network: A Sociology of the New Age and Neo-Pagan Movements. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.  


  1. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 70; Gardell 2003, p. 2; Gregorius 2015, p. 64; Velkoborská 2015, p. 89.
  2. ^ Blain 2005, pp. 183–184; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 138; Horrell 2012, p. 1; Pizza 2014, p. 48; Snook 2015, p. 9.
  3. ^ Horrell 2012, p. 1.
  4. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 138.
  5. ^ Blain 2005, pp. 182, 185–186; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 138–141; Snook 2015, p. 12.
  6. ^ Snook 2015, p. 53.
  7. ^ Blain 2005, p. 182.
  8. ^ Strmiska 2000, p. 106.
  9. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 159.
  10. ^ Snook 2015, p. 50.
  11. ^ Blain 2005, p. 185; Gregorius 2015, pp. 74, 75.
  12. ^ Snook 2015, p. 49.
  13. ^ a b c d e f Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 126.
  14. ^ a b Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 137.
  15. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 141.
  16. ^ Doyle White 2014, p. 303.
  17. ^ Snook 2015, p. 60.
  18. ^ Gregorius 2015, p. 64.
  19. ^ Blain 2005, p. 184.
  20. ^ Horrell 2012, p. 5; Snook 2015, p. 145; Gregorius 2015, p. 74.
  21. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 52.
  22. ^ Snook 2015, pp. 8–9.
  23. ^ Gregorius 2015, pp. 65–66.
  24. ^ Snook 2015, p. 9.
  25. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 52; Blain 2002, p. 6; Blain 2005, p. 181.
  26. ^ Blain 2002, p. 6; Gardell 2003, p. 31; Davy 2007, p. 158.
  27. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 31; Blain 2005, p. 181.
  28. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 49; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 128; Harvey 2007, p. 53.
  29. ^ Blain 2002, p. 5.
  30. ^ a b Strmiska 2007, p. 155.
  31. ^ Blain 2002, p. 5; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 128; Adler 2006, p. 286; Harvey 2007, p. 53; Snook 2015, p. 9.
  32. ^ Gregorius 2015, p. 65.
  33. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 128.
  34. ^ Strmiska 2000, p. 113; Amster 2015, pp. 44–45.
  35. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 53; Harvey 2007, p. 53.
  36. ^ Blain 2002, p. 5; Gregorius 2015, pp. 65, 75.
  37. ^ Blain 2005, p. 182; Davy 2007, p. 158.
  38. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 165; Harvey 2007, p. 53.
  39. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 152; Asprem 2008, p. 45.
  40. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 152.
  41. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 156.
  42. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 126; Gardell 2003, p. 154; Blain 2005, p. 186; Harvey 2007, p. 55; Davy 2007, p. 159.
  43. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 156, 267; Blain 2005, p. 186; Harvey 2007, p. 57; Davy 2007, p. 159.
  44. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 71; Gardell 2003, pp. 156, 267; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 143.
  45. ^ Amster 2015, p. 48.
  46. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 155; Blain 2005, p. 187; Harvey 2007, p. 55.
  47. ^ a b Blain 2005, p. 188.
  48. ^ Velkoborská 2015, p. 103.
  49. ^ Snook 2015, p. 76.
  50. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 268; Snook 2015, p. 57.
  51. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 51; Gardell 2003, p. 268; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 142; Harvey 2007, p. 55.
  52. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 72; Gardell 2003, p. 268.
  53. ^ York 1995, p. 125.
  54. ^ Blain 2005, p. 186.
  55. ^ Blain 2005, p. 189.
  56. ^ a b c Harvey 2007, p. 57.
  57. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 268.
  58. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 126; Blain 2005, p. 187; Harvey 2007, p. 56; Davy 2007, p. 159.
  59. ^ Harvey 2007, p. 56; Snook 2015, p. 13.
  60. ^ Blain 2005, pp. 187–188.
  61. ^ Snook 2015, p. 13.
  62. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 126; Snook 2015, p. 64.
  63. ^ Strmiska 2007, pp. 174–175; Blain 2005, p. 187.
  64. ^ Blain 2005, p. 187.
  65. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 154; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 142; Blain 2005, p. 190; Harvey 2007, p. 54; Davy 2007, p. 159.
  66. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 143; Harvey 2007, p. 57.
  67. ^ Blain 2005, p. 190; Harvey 2007, pp. 55–56.
  68. ^ Harvey 2007, p. 55.
  69. ^ Harvey 2007, p. 56.
  70. ^ Blain 2002, p. 15.
  71. ^ a b Snook 2015, p. 64.
  72. ^ a b Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 142.
  73. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 142–143.
  74. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 279–280.
  75. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 69.
  76. ^ Snook 2015, p. 57.
  77. ^ Strmiska 2000, p. 121.
  78. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 161; Snook 2015, pp. 58–59.
  79. ^ a b c Gardell 2003, p. 161.
  80. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 146.
  81. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 139.
  82. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 157.
  83. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 139.
  84. ^ a b c d e f Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127.
  85. ^ Snook 2015, p. 70.
  86. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 157; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 143, 145; Snook 2015, pp. 70–71.
  87. ^ a b Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 145.
  88. ^ a b Snook 2015, p. 72.
  89. ^ Gregorius 2015, p. 78.
  90. ^ Snook 2015, p. 45.
  91. ^ Snook 2015, p. 110.
  92. ^ Snook 2015, pp. 116–117.
  93. ^ Snook 2015, p. 113.
  94. ^ Snook 2015, pp. 18–19.
  95. ^ Blain 2005, p. 205; Harvey 2007, p. 65.
  96. ^ a b c d Harvey 2007, p. 66.
  97. ^ Blain 2005, p. 205.
  98. ^ Snook 2015, p. 74.
  99. ^ Snook 2015, pp. 73–74.
  100. ^ a b Blain 2005, p. 204.
  101. ^ Gregorius 2015, p. 79.
  102. ^ Kaplan 1996, p. 224; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 128.
  103. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127; Gardell 2003, p. 157; Blain 2005, p. 191; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 131; Davy 2007, p. 159; Snook 2015, pp. 22, 85.
  104. ^ a b c Blain 2005, p. 191.
  105. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 131; Snook 2015, p. 92.
  106. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 133.
  107. ^ a b Snook 2015, p. 92.
  108. ^ Blain 2005, p. 193; Snook 2015, p. 93.
  109. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 157; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 131; Snook 2015, p. 85.
  110. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127; Gardell 2003, p. 158; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 132; Snook 2015, p. 90.
  111. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 132; Harvey 2007, p. 61.
  112. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127; Snook 2015, p. 91.
  113. ^ Snook 2015, p. 22.
  114. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 159.
  115. ^ Helgason, Magnús Sveinn (7 August 2015). "Visit the only heathen temple in Iceland in Skagafjörður fjord for a pagan grill party this Saturday". Iceland Magazine. Archived from the original on 26 October 2015. 
  116. ^ Millard, Lucy (18 June 2015). "World's first modern-day pagan temple is in Newark". NewarkAdvertiser. Archived from the original on 26 October 2015. Retrieved 26 October 2015. 
  117. ^ Blain & Wallis 2007, p. 140.
  118. ^ Blain & Wallis 2007, p. 178.
  119. ^ Blain 2005, p. 195.
  120. ^ Strmiska 2000, p. 118.
  121. ^ a b c d e f g h Harvey 2007, p. 59.
  122. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 55; Harvey 2007, p. 59; Davy 2007, p. 159; Snook 2015, pp. 9–10.
  123. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 126; Blain 2005, p. 194; Adler 2006, p. 294.
  124. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, pp. 126–127; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 130; Blain 2005, p. 195.
  125. ^ Blain 2005, p. 194.
  126. ^ Blain 2005, pp. 194–195.
  127. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 126; Strmiska 2007, p. 165.
  128. ^ Strmiska 2007, p. 156.
  129. ^ Strmiska 2007, p. 166.
  130. ^ Strmiska 2007, p. 168.
  131. ^ Strmiska 2007, pp. 169–170, 183.
  132. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127; Gardell 2003, pp. 159–160; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 129–130; Blain 2005, p. 194.
  133. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127; Blain 2005, p. 195.
  134. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 129; Adler 2006, p. 291.
  135. ^ Snook 2015, p. 11.
  136. ^ Pizza 2014, p. 47.
  137. ^ Harvey 2007, p. 62.
  138. ^ Blain 2002, pp. 47–50.
  139. ^ Adler 2006, p. 396.
  140. ^ Magliocco 2004, pp. 226–227.
  141. ^ Blain 2002, pp. 32–33; Adler 2006, p. 296.
  142. ^ Blain 2002, p. 57; Velkoborská 2015, p. 93.
  143. ^ Blain 2002, p. 57.
  144. ^ Blain 2002, p. 15; Blain 2005, p. 206; Harvey 2007, p. 62.
  145. ^ Snook 2015, p. 137.
  146. ^ Blain 2002, p. 18; Snook 2015, p. 137.
  147. ^ Kaplan 1996, pp. 221–222.
  148. ^ Strmiska 2007, p. 171.
  149. ^ a b c Blain 2005, p. 196.
  150. ^ Harvey 2007, pp. 61–62.
  151. ^ Blain 2005, p. 196; Harvey 2007, p. 61.
  152. ^ Harvey 2007, p. 61.
  153. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 49.
  154. ^ Hunt-Anschutz 2002, p. 127; Harvey 2007, p. 58; Davy 2007, p. 159.
  155. ^ a b c d Harvey 2007, p. 58.
  156. ^ Adler 2006, p. 287.
  157. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 131–132.
  158. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 132.
  159. ^ a b Gardell 2003, p. 153.
  160. ^ Kaplan 1996, p. 202; Gardell 2003, p. 153; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 134; Blain 2005, p. 193.
  161. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 134–135; Adler 2006, pp. 29–294.
  162. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 78.
  163. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 165.
  164. ^ Asprem 2008, p. 48.
  165. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 134–135.
  166. ^ Harvey 2007, p. 67.
  167. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 77; Gardell 2003, p. 163.
  168. ^ Kaplan 1996, p. 224; Gardell 2003, p. 164; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 128.
  169. ^ Blain 2005, p. 193.
  170. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 81; Harvey 2007, pp. 66–67.
  171. ^ Kaplan 1997, pp. 80–82; Gardell 2003, pp. 269–273.
  172. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 271.
  173. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 278.
  174. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 273–274.
  175. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 136.
  176. ^ a b Gardell 2003, p. 165.
  177. ^ a b Kaplan 1997, p. 85.
  178. ^ Kaplan 1997, pp. 69–70.
  179. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 86.
  180. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 196–197.
  181. ^ Kaplan 1997, p. 94.
  182. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 292–293.
  183. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 320–321.
  184. ^ Snook 2015, pp. 13–14.
  185. ^ a b Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 52.
  186. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 49.
  187. ^ Asprem 2008, pp. 48–49.
  188. ^ Kaplan 1996, pp. 194–195; Asbjørn Jøn 1999, pp. 77–78; Asprem 2008, pp. 45–46.
  189. ^ Asbjørn Jøn 1999, p. 77.
  190. ^ Asbjørn Jøn 1999, p. 78.
  191. ^ Harvey 2007, p. 60.
  192. ^ Carl Jung mentions this movement in his 1936 essay "Wotan". Jung, Carl G. (1970); Collected Works, Volume 10; Routledge & Kegan Paul, London; ISBN 0-7100-1640-9; pp. 190-91.
  193. ^ Lange, Hans-Jürgen (1998). Weisthor: Karl Maria Wiligut - Himmlers Rasputin und seine Erben. 
  194. ^  
  195. ^ Blain 2005, p. 192.
  196. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 127; Adler 2006, p. 286; Asprem 2008, p. 46; Snook 2015, p. 8.
  197. ^ Asprem 2008, p. 47.
  198. ^ Paxson 2002, p. 17.
  199. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 165; Asprem 2008, p. 46.
  200. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 167–168.
  201. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 171; Asprem 2008, p. 46.
  202. ^ Kaplan 1996, p. 226; Adler 2006, p. 289.
  203. ^ Kaplan 1996, pp. 200–205; Paxson 2002, pp. 16–17; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 128; Adler 2006, p. 286.
  204. ^ Kaplan 1996, pp. 206–213; Paxson 2002, p. 18.
  205. ^ Kaplan 1996, pp. 213–215; Paxson 2002, p. 18.
  206. ^ Strmiska 2000, p. 108.
  207. ^ Strmiska 2000, p. 112; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 166–168; Asprem 2008, p. 46.
  208. ^ a b Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 166–168.
  209. ^ Kaplan 1996, pp. 199–200; Asprem 2008, pp. 46–47.
  210. ^ Harvey 1995, p. 61.
  211. ^ Gregorius 2015, p. 68.
  212. ^ Gregorius 2015, pp. 70–71.
  213. ^ Asprem 2008, p. 49.
  214. ^ Asprem 2008, pp. 49–50.
  215. ^ Amster 2015, p. 43.
  216. ^ Blain 2005, p. 191; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 133; Amster 2015, p. 45.
  217. ^ Gardell 2003, p. 324.
  218. ^ Strmiska 2007, p. 155; Davy 2007, p. 158.
  219. ^ Harvey 2007, pp. 53.
  220. ^ a b "The Norse Mythology Blog: WORLDWIDE HEATHEN CENSUS 2013: RESULTS & ANALYSIS - Articles & Interviews on Myth & Relgion". Retrieved 22 July 2015. 
  221. ^ Kaplan 1996, pp. 197–198; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 147; Amster 2015, p. 49.
  222. ^ Kaplan 1996, p. 198; Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, pp. 155–156.
  223. ^ Amster 2015, p. 49.
  224. ^ Amster 2015, p. 47.
  225. ^ Kaplan 1996, p. 198.
  226. ^ Kaplan 1996, p. 199.
  227. ^ a b Berger, Leagh & Shaffer 2003, p. 16.
  228. ^ Snook 2015, p. 24.
  229. ^ Snook 2015, p. 108.
  230. ^ "Viking Mythology Grows As Religion for Inmates". Associated Press. 24 July 2006. Retrieved 22 July 2015. 
  231. ^ Office for National Statistics, 11 December 2012, 2011 Census, Key Statistics for Local Authorities in England and Wales. Accessed 12 December 2012.
  232. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 168.
  233. ^ Moore, Elizabeth Armstrong (3 February 2015). "Iceland building first Norse temple in 1K years". Newser. Archived from the original on 26 October 2015. 
  234. ^ Strmiska & Sigurvinsson 2005, p. 174.
  235. ^ Amster 2015, pp. 47–48.
  236. ^ Gregorius 2015, pp. 72–73.
  237. ^ Gregorius 2015, p. 72.


  1. ^ On the alleged existence of a collective Germanic paganism in medieval times, Professor Lois Bragg makes this observation: "But we have no persuasive evidence of any common cult, belief system, or even pantheon that might ever have been recognized among speakers of various Germanic languages across geographical, cultural, political, and dialect boundaries. While there are obvious commonalities, for example in the names of some deities (Odin, Woden, Wotan), these point to common origins rather than common praxis or belief. Compare present-dy Jews, Lutherans, and Mormons who share common myths (the expulsion from the Garden of Eden, the Moses cycle, the Patriarch cycle ) and who similarly name their children after the heroes of these myths (Adam, Aaron, Judith, Rebecca), but maintain distinctive cult practices and identities and even disparage and attempt to convert one another." Lois Bragg. Oedipus Borealis: The Aberrant Body in Old Icelandic Myth and Saga Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. 2004. page 54. ISBN 0838640281



See also

[237] By 2003,

In the United Kingdom Census 2001, 300 people registered as Heathen in England and Wales.[104] However, many Heathens followed the advice of the Pagan Federation (PF) and simply described themselves as "Pagan", while other Heathens did not specify their religious beliefs.[104] In the 2011 census, 1,958 people self-identified as Heathen in England and Wales.[231]


Although deeming it impossible to calculate the exact size of the Heathen community in the US, sociologist Jeffrey Kaplan estimated that, in the mid-1990s, there were around 500 active practitioners in the country, with a further thousand individuals on the periphery of the movement.[225] He noted that the overwhelming majority of individuals in the movement were white, male, and young. Most had at least an undergraduate degree, and worked in a mix of white collar and blue collar jobs.[226] The Pagan Census project led by Helen A. Berger, Evan A. Leach, and Leigh S. Shaffer gained 60 responses from Heathens in the U.S., noting that 65% were male and 35% female, which they saw as the "opposite" of the rest of the country's Pagan community.[227] The majority had a college education, but were generally less well educated than the wider Pagan community, with a lower median income than the wider Pagan community too.[227] From her experience within the community, Snook concurred that the majority of American Heathens were male, adding also that most were also white and middle-aged,[228] but believed that there had been a growth in the proportion of Heathen women in the U.S. since the mid-1990s.[229] Subsequent assessments have suggested a larger support base; 10,000 to 20,000 according to McNallen,[230] and 7,878 according to the 2014 census.[220]

North America

Many individuals are inspired to join the movement after enjoying German folk tales or Norse myths as children, or after being interested by the depiction of Norse religion in popular culture.[221] Some others claim to have involved themselves in the religion after experiencing direct revelation through the forms of dreams, which they interpret as having been provided by the gods.[222] A sensation of "coming home" has also been reported by many Heathens who have converted to the faith.[223] Although practitioners typically live within Christian majority societies, they typically express the view that Christianity has little to offer them.[224]

Adherents of Heathenry can be found in Europe, North America, and Australasia.[218] In 2007, the religious studies scholar Graham Harvey stated that it was impossible to develop a precise figure for the number of Heathens across the world,[219] however a self-selected census conducted in 2013 found 16,700 members in 98 countries, the bulk of whom lived in the United States.[220]

An Odinist wedding in Spain, 2010


From the mid-1990s, the internet greatly aided the propagation of Heathenry in various parts of the world.[216] That decade also saw the strong growth of racist Heathenry among those incarcerated within the U.S. prison system.[217]

[215] The first Norwegian Heathen group, Blindern Åsatrulag, was established as a student group at the [212] In 1994, the Sveriges Asatrosamfund (Swedish Asatru Assembly) was founded, growing to become the largest Heathen organisation in the country.[211] In Sweden, the first Heathen groups developed in the 1970s; early examples included the Breidablikk-Gildet (Guild of Breidablikk) founded in 1975 and the Telge Fylking founded in 1987, the latter of which diverged from the former by emphasising a non-racialist interpretation of the religion.

In Iceland, the influence of pre-Christian belief systems still pervaded the country's cultural heritage into the 20th century.[206] There, farmer Sveinbjörn Beinteinsson founded the Heathen group Ásatrúarfélagið in 1972, which initially had 12 members.[207] Beinteinsson served as Allsherjargodi (chief priest) until his death in 1993, when he was succeeded by Jormundur Ingi Hansen.[208] As the group expanded in size, Hansen's leadership caused schisms, and to retain the unity of the movement, he stepped down and was replaced by Hilmar Orn Hilmarsson in 2003, by which time it had accumulated 777 members and played a visible role in Icelandic society.[208] In England, the British Committee for the Restoration of the Odinic Rite was established by John Yeowell in 1972.[209] In 1992, Mark Mirabello published The Odin Brotherhood, which claimed the existence of a secret society of Odinists; most British Heathens doubt its existence.[210]

[205] In 1969 the Danish Odinist [198] Asatru grew steadily in the United States during the 1960s.

In the early 1970s, Heathen organisations emerged in the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, and in Iceland, largely independently of each other.[196] This has been partly attributed to the wider growth of the modern Pagan movement in the 1960s and 1970s, which encouraged the establishment of new religious movements intent on reviving pre-Christian religions.[197]

Modern development

After the Second World War, many felt that the mythologies of the pre-Christian Germanic societies had been tainted through their usage by the Nazi administration, an attitude that to some extent persisted into the 21st century.[195]

Several books published by the Nazi party - including Die Gestaltung der Feste im Jahres- und Lebenslauf in der SS-Familie (The Celebrations in the Life of the SS Family) by Fritz Weitzel, as well as the SS Tante Friede - illustrate how the National Socialists regarded traditional Germanic heathenry as primitive superstition which needed reworking to better serve the state. Celebrating the traditional festivals like Jul and Sommersonnenwende were encouraged and recast into veneration of the Nazi state and Führer.[194]

Several early members of the Nazi Party belonged to the Thule Society, a study group for German antiquity. The eclectic German Faith Movement (Deutsche Glaubensbewegung), founded by the Sanskrit scholar Jakob Wilhelm Hauer, enjoyed a degree of popularity during the Nazi period.[192] Some Germanic mysticists were victimized by the Nazis: Friedrich Bernhard Marby spent 99 months in KZ Dachau, and Siegfried Adolf Kummer's fate is unknown.[193]

A variant of "Odinism" was developed by the Australian Alexander Rud Mills, who published The Odinist Religion (1930) and established the Anglican Church of Odin. Politically racialist, Mills viewed Odinism as a religion for the English race which was in a cosmic battle with Judeo-Christian religion.[188] Having formulated "his own unique blend" of Ariosophy,[189] Mills was heavily influenced by von List's writings.[190] Some of Heathenry's roots have been traced to the "back to nature" movement of the early 20th-century, among them the Kibbo Kift and the Order of Woodcraft Chivalry.[191]

In Austria during the early 20th century, the occultist Guido von List established a religion that he termed "Wotanism", with an Ariosophic inner core to the movement being termed "Armanism" by him.[185] List's Wotanism was based heavily on the Eddas,[186] although over time it came to be increasingly influenced by the occult teachings of the Theosophical Society.[185] The völkisch movement also emerged in 1930s Norway with the milieu surrounding the Ragnarok Circle and Hans S. Jacobsen's Tidsskriftet Ragnarok journal; prominent figures involved in this milieu were the writer Per Imerslund and composer Geirr Tveitt, although it left no successors in post-war Norway.[187]

Guido von List

Romanticism and the Völkisch movement


Some folkish Heathens are Order of Nine Angles and the Black Order, combine elements of Heathenism with Satanism,[182] although other racist Heathen groups such as Wotansvolk have denounced the integration of these differing approaches.[183] Racist Heathens are also heavily critical of their anti-racist counterparts, often declaring that the latter have been confused by the New Age movement and political correctness.[176] Snook stated that both mainstream media and early academic studies of American Heathenry had focused primarily on the racist elements within the movement, thus neglecting their anti-racist counterparts.[184]

The folkish sector of the movement deems Heathenry to be the indigenous religion of a biologically distinct Nordic race.[96] Some practitioners explain this by asserting that the religion is intrinsically connected to the collective unconscious of this race,[170] with prominent American Asatruer Stephen McNallen developing this into a concept that he termed "metagenetics".[171] McNallen and many others in the "ethnic" faction of Heathenry explicitly deny that they are racist, although Gardell noted that their views would be deemed to be racist under certain definitions of the word.[172] Gardell considered many "ethnic" Heathens to be ethnonationalists,[173] and many folkish practitioners express disapproval of multiculturalism and the mixture of different races in modern Europe, advocating a position of racial separatism.[96] In this group's discourse, there is much talk of "ancestors" and "homelands", although these concepts may be very vaguely defined.[14] Those adopting the "ethnic" folkish position have been criticized by both anti-racist and radical racist factions, the former deeming "ethnic" Heathenry to be a front for racism and the latter deeming its adherents to be race traitors for their failure to fully embrace the white supremacist cause.[174]

The universalist, anti-racist approach believes that the deities of Northern Europe can call anyone to their worship, regardless of ethnic background.[165] This group rejects the folkish emphasis on race, believing that even if unintended, it can lead to the adoption of racist attitudes toward those of non-Northern European heritage.[166] Anti-racist practitioners such as KveldúlfR Gundarsson have emphasized the fact that ancient Northern Europeans were known to marry and breed with members of other ethnic groups, and that in Norse mythology the Æsir also did the same with Vanir, Jötun, and humans, thus using such points to critique the racialist view.[167] Universalists welcome practitioners of Heathenry who are not of Northern European ancestry; for instance, there are Jewish and African-American members of the U.S.-based Ring of Troth, while many of its white members are in biracial marriages.[168] While sometimes retaining the idea of Heathenry as an indigenous religion, proponents of this view have sometimes argued that Heathenry is indigenous to the land of Northern Europe, rather than any race.[169]

Altar for Haustblot in Björkö, Westgothland, Sweden. The big wooden idol represents the god Frey (Ing), the smaller one next to it represents Freya (Walpurgis), the picture in front of it Sunna (Sun), and the small red idol Thor.

Gardell categorizes Heathenry in the United States into three groups according to their stance on the issue of race: the "anti-racist" group who denounce any express association between the religion and racial identity, the "radical racist" faction who see it as the natural religion of the white race which cannot rightly be followed by members of any other racial groups, and the "ethnic" faction who seek a middle-path by acknowledging the religion's roots in Northern Europe and its connection with those of Northern European heritage.[159] Religious studies scholar Egil Asprem deemed Gardell's threefold typology to be "indispensable to make sense of the diverging positions within the broader discourse" of Heathenry.[164]

The question of race represents a major source of diviseness within the Heathen movement, particularly in the United States.[160] Within the Heathen community, one viewpoint holds that race is entirely a matter of biological heredity, while the opposing position is that race is only a social construct rooted in cultural heritage. In U.S. Heathen discourse, these viewpoints are described as the folkish and the universalist positions, respectively.[161] These two factions – which Kaplan termed the "racialist" and "nonracialist" camps – often clash, with Kaplan claiming that a "virtual civil war" existed between them within the American Heathen community.[162] In contrast to North America and much of Northern Europe, discussions of race rarely arise among the Icelandic Heathen community as a result of the nation-state's predominantly ethnically homogenous composition.[163]

"Far from being a monolithic entity, [Heathenry] in the United States is extremely diverse, with many distinct ideological variations and organizations with profoundly different opinions concerning what Asatrú/Odinism is all about. The key divisive issues are centered on race and for whom the Nordic path is intended."

— Religious studies scholar Mattias Gardell[159]

Racial issues

Such festivals can be held on the same day each year, although they are often celebrated by Heathen communities on the nearest available weekend, so that those practitioners who work during the week can attend.[121] During these ceremonies, Heathens typically recite poetry to honour the deities, which typically draw on or imitate the poems originally written in Old Norse or Old English.[121] Mead or ale is also typically drunk, with offerings being given to deities,[121] while fires, torches, or candles are often lit.[121] There are also regional meetings of Heathens known as Things. At these, religious rites are performed, while workshops, stalls, feasts, and competitive games are also present.[157] In the U.S., there are two national gatherings, Althing and Trothmoot.[158]

Some Germanic Neopagans celebrate the eight festivals found in the Wheel of the Year, a tradition that they share with other contemporary Pagan religions.[155] Others celebrate only six of these festivals, as represented by a six-spoked Wheel of the Year.[156] The use of such festivals is criticised by other practitioners, who highlight that they are of modern origin and do not link with the original religious celebrations of Early Medieval linguistically Germanic society.[155]

Different Germanic Neopagan groups celebrate different festivals according to their cultural and religious focus.[84] The most widely observed Heathen festivals are Winternights, Yule, and Sigrblot, all of which were listed in his Heimskringla and are thus of ancient origin.[154] The first of these marks the start of winter in Northern Europe, while the second marks Midwinter, and the last marks the beginning of summer.[155] Additional festivals are also marked by Heathen practice throughout the year.[155] These often include days which commemorate individuals who fought against the Christianisation of Northern Europe, or who led armies and settlers into new lands.[121] Some Heathen groups hold festivals dedicated to a specific deity.[121]

An Icelandic Pagan community of the Íslenska Ásatrúarfélagið preparing for a Þingblót at Þingvellir


Some Heathens practice forms of divination using runes; as part of this, items with runic markings on them might be pulled out of a bag or bundle, and read accordingly.[151] In some cases, different runes are associated with different deities, one of the nine realms, or aspects of life.[152] It is common for Germanic Neopagans to utilize the Common Germanic Futhark as a runic alphabet, although some practitioners instead adopt the Anglo-Saxon Futhark or the Younger Futhark.[149] The contemporary use of runes for divinatory purposes is however found more widely than within Heathenry, with books on the subject being common in New Age bookstores.[153] Due to the fact that it was not a factor of common Iron Age and Early Medieval European rituals, magic is not an intrinsic part of Heathenry, although various magical practices are performed by some practitioners.[84]

Galdr is another Germanic Neopagan practice involving chanting or singing.[149] As part of a galdr ceremony, runes or runic poems are also sometimes chanted, in order to create a communal mood and allow participants to enter into altered states of consciousness and request communication with deities.[150] Some contemporary galdr chants and songs are influenced by Anglo-Saxon folk magical charms, such as Acerbot and the Nine Herbs Charm. These poems were originally written in a Christian context, although practitioners believe that they reflect themes present in pre-Christian, shamanic religion, and thus re-appropriate and "Heathanise" them.[149]

Not all Heathens practice seiðr, and many on the movement's right-wing disapprove of it, particularly given its association with the ambiguity of sexuality and gender and the form of Odin or Loki in their inimitable or unreliable, trickster forms.[144] Although there are heterosexual male practitioners,[145] seiðr is largely associated with – and most often performed by – women and gay men.[146] One member of the Ring of Troth, Edred Thorsson, experimented with forms of seiðr which involved sex magic utilising sado-masochistic techniques, something which generated controversy in the community.[147] Part of the discomfort some Heathens feel toward seiðr surrounds the lack of any criteria by which the community can determine whether the seiðr-worker has genuinely received divine communication, and the fear that it will be used by some practitioners merely to bolster their own prestige.[148]

A Heathen shrine to Freyr, Sweden, 2010

One religious practice sometimes found in Heathenry is Seiðr, which has been described as "a particular shamanic trance ritual complex",[137] although the appropriateness of using "shamanism" to describe seiðr is debatable.[138] Contemporary seiðr developed during the 1990s out of the wider Neo-Shamanic movement,[139] with some practitioners turning to Umbanda to learn about trance-states.[140] A prominent form is high-seat or oracular seiðr, which is based on the account of Guðriðr in Eiríks saga. Although such practices do differ between different groups, oracular seiðr typically involves a seiðr-worker sitting on a high seat while songs and chants are performed to invoke gods and wights. Drumming is then performed to induce an altered state of consciousness in the practitioner, who then goes on a meditative journey through Yggdrassil to Hel. The assembled audience then provide questions for the seiðr-worker, which they then reply to using information that they have obtained in their trance-state.[141] Some seiðr-practitioners make use of entheogenic substances as part of this practice,[142] although others explicitly oppose such usage.[143]

Seiðr and Galdr

Another common ritual in Heathenry is sumbel, also spelled symbel, a ritual drinking ceremony in which the gods are toasted.[132] Sumbel often takes place following a blot.[133] In the U.S., the sumbel commonly involves a drinking horn being filled with mead and passed among the assembled participants, who either drink from it directly, or pour some into their own drinking vessels to consume. During this process, toasts are made, as are verbal tributes to gods, heroes, and ancestors. Then, oaths and boasts (promises of future actions) might be made, both of which are considered binding on the speakers due to the sacred context of the sumbel ceremony.[134] According to the sociologist of religion and practicing Heathen Jennifer Snook, the sumbel has a strong social role, representing "a game of politicking, of socializing, cementing bonds of peace and friendship and forming new relationships" within the Heathen community.[135] The ethnographer Murphy Pizza observed an example of a sumbel that took place in Minnesota in 2006 with the purpose of involving Heathen children; rather than mead, the drinking horn contained apple juice, and the toasting accompanied the children taping pictures of apples to a poster of a tree that symbolized the apple tree of Iðunn from Norse mythology.[136]

In Iron Age and Early Medieval Northern Europe, blót referred to animal sacrifice performed to thank the deities and gain their favor.[127] Such sacrifices have generally proved impractical for most modern practitioners, due to the fact that skills in animal slaughter are not widely taught, while the slaughter of animals is regulated by government in Western countries.[13] However, in 2007 Strmiska noted that a "small but growing" number of Heathen practitioners in the U.S. had begun performing animal sacrifice as a part of blót.[128] Those who do so typically follow the procedure outlined in the Heimskringla: the throat of the sacrificial animal is slashed with a sharp knife, and the blood is collected in a bowl, before being sprinkled onto both participants of the rite and statues of the gods.[129] Species used for this purpose have included poultry as well as larger mammals like sheep and pigs, with the meat then being consumed by those attending the rite.[130] Some practitioners have made alterations to this procedure: Strmiska for instance noted two American Heathens who decided to use a rifle shot to the head to kill the animal swiftly, a decision made after they witnessed a blót in which the animal's throat was cut incorrectly and it slowly died in agony; they felt that this butchery would have displeased the gods and accordingly brought harm upon those carrying out the sacrifice.[131]

The Swedish Asatru Society holding a blót, 2008.

The most important religious rite for Heathens is called Blót, which constitutes a ritual in which offerings are provided to the gods.[123] Blót typically takes place outdoors, and usually consists of an offering of mead, which is contained within a bowl. The gods are invoked and requests expressed for their aid, as the priest uses a sprig or branch of an evergreen tree to sprinkle mead onto both statues of the deities and the assembled participants. This procedure might be scripted or largely improvised. Finally, the bowl of mead is poured onto a fire, or onto the earth, as a final libation to the gods.[124] Sometimes, a feast is held afterward.[13] In other instances, the blót is less ritualized and much simpler; in this case, it can involve a practitioner setting some food aside, sometimes without words, for either gods or wights.[125] Some Heathens perform such rituals on a daily basis, although for others it is a more occasional performance.[71] Aside from honoring deities, communal blóts also serve as a form of group bonding.[126]

Blót and sumbel

Germanic Neopagan groups assemble for rituals in order to mark rites of passage, seasonal observances, oath takings, rites devoted for a specific deity, and for rites of need.[84] These rites also serve as identity practices which mark the adherents out as Heathens.[119] Strmiska noted that in Iceland, Ásatrú rituals consciously attempted to recreate or pay tribute to the ritual practices of pre-Christian Icelanders, although also had space in which to innovate and change to suit the tastes and needs of contemporary practitioners.[120] During religious ceremonies, many adherents choose to wear clothing that imitates the styles of dress worn in Iron Age and Early Medieval Northern Europe.[121] They also often wear symbols indicating their religious allegiance. The most commonly used sign among Heathens is Mjöllnir, or Thor's hammer, which is worn as pendants, featured in Heathen art, and used as a gesture in ritual. It is sometimes used to express a particular affinity with the god Thor, although is also often used as a symbol of Heathenism as a whole, in particular representing the resilience and vitality of the religion.[122] Another commonly used Heathen symbol is the valknut, used to represent the god Odin or Woden.[121]

Heathen rites often take place in non-public spaces, particularly in a practitioner's home.[113] In other cases, Heathen places of worship have been established on plots of land specifically purchased for the purpose; these can represent either a hörg, which is a sanctified place within nature like a grove of trees, or a hof, which is a wooden temple.[114] In 2014, the Ásaheimur Temple was opened in Efri Ás, Skagafjörður, Iceland,[115] while in 2015 British Odinists opened a temple in converted a 16th-century chapel in Newark, Nottinghamshire.[116] Germanic Neopagans have also adopted archaeological sites as places of worship; for instance, British practitioners have assembled at Nine Ladies stone circle in Derbyshire,[117] and the Rollright Stones in Warwickshire.[118]

[112], adopting gydhja, while priestesses are godhi Priests are often termed

A Heathen altar for household worship in Gothenburg, Sweden. The painted tablet on the back depicts Sunna, the two larger wooden idols Odin (left) and Frey (right), in front of them there are the three Norns, and in the front row a red Thor and other idols. In front of the cult images are two ritual hammers.

In Anglophone countries, Heathen groups are typically called kindreds, hearths, fellowships, tribes, or garths.[103] These are small groups, often family units,[104] and usually consist of between five to fifteen members.[84] They are often bound together by oaths of loyalty,[105] with strict screening procedures as to whom they allow to join them.[106] Prospective members may undergo a probationary period before they are fully accepted and welcomed into the group,[107] while other groups remain closed to all new members.[107] Such groups are largely independent and autonomous, although typically network with other Heathen groups, particularly in their region.[108] There are other followers of the religion who are not affiliated with such groups, operating as solitary practitioners, with these individuals often remaining in contact with other practitioners through social media.[109]

Rites and practices


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.