World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Misconceptions about HIV/AIDS

Article Id: WHEBN0000368736
Reproduction Date:

Title: Misconceptions about HIV/AIDS  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Safe sex, Misconceptions, HIV/AIDS denialism, HIV/AIDS in Thailand, HIV Drug Resistance Database
Collection: Hiv/Aids, Hiv/Aids Denialism, Misconceptions
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Misconceptions about HIV/AIDS

The spread of HIV infections per year and 2 million annual deaths due to AIDS.[2] In 2007, UNAIDS estimated: 33.2 million people worldwide were living with HIV; AIDS killed 2.1 million people in the course of that year, including 330,000 children, and 76% of those deaths occurred in sub-Saharan Africa.[3] According to the UNAIDS 2009 report, some 60 million people worldwide have been infected with HIV, resulting in approximately 25 million deaths and 14 million orphaned children in southern Africa alone since the epidemic began decades ago.[4]

Misconceptions about HIV and AIDS arise from several different sources, from simple ignorance and misunderstandings about scientific knowledge regarding HIV infections and the etiology of AIDS to misinformation propagated by individuals and groups with ideological stances that deny a causative relationship between HIV infection and the development of AIDS. Below is a list and explanations of some common misconceptions and their rebuttals.


  • The relationship between HIV and AIDS 1
    • HIV is the same as AIDS 1.1
  • Treatment 2
    • Cure 2.1
    • Sexual intercourse with a virgin will cure AIDS 2.2
    • Sexual intercourse with an animal will avoid or cure AIDS 2.3
    • HIV antibody testing is unreliable 2.4
  • HIV infection 3
    • HIV can be spread through casual contact with an HIV infected individual 3.1
    • HIV-positive individuals can be detected by their appearance 3.2
    • HIV cannot be transmitted through oral sex 3.3
    • HIV is transmitted by mosquitoes 3.4
    • HIV survives for only a short time outside the body 3.5
    • HIV can infect only homosexual men and drug users 3.6
    • An HIV-infected mother cannot have children 3.7
    • HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS because the body develops a vigorous antibody response to the virus 3.8
    • Only a small number of CD4+ T-cells are infected by HIV, not enough to damage the immune system 3.9
  • History of HIV/AIDS 4
    • HIV was introduced to North America by a Canadian flight attendant 4.1
    • Origin of AIDS through human–monkey sexual intercourse 4.2
  • AIDS denialism 5
    • There is no AIDS in Africa, as AIDS is nothing more than a new name for old diseases 5.1
    • HIV is not the cause of AIDS 5.2
      • AZT and other antiretroviral drugs, not HIV, cause AIDS 5.2.1
      • Behavioral factors such as recreational drug use and multiple sexual partners—not HIV—account for AIDS 5.2.2
      • AIDS among transfusion recipients is due to underlying diseases that necessitated the transfusion, rather than to HIV 5.2.3
      • High usage of clotting factor concentrate, not HIV, leads to CD4+ T-cell depletion and AIDS in hemophiliacs 5.2.4
      • The distribution of AIDS cases casts doubt on HIV as the cause. Viruses are not gender-specific, yet only a small proportion of AIDS cases are among women 5.2.5
      • HIV is not the cause of AIDS because many individuals with HIV have not developed AIDS 5.2.6
      • HIV is not the cause of AIDS because some people have symptoms associated with AIDS but are not infected with HIV 5.2.7
      • The spectrum of AIDS-related infections seen in different populations proves that AIDS is actually many diseases not caused by HIV 5.2.8
    • AIDS can be prevented with complementary or alternative medicine 5.3
  • See also 6
  • References 7
  • External links 8

The relationship between HIV and AIDS

HIV is the same as AIDS

HIV is an acronym for human immunodeficiency virus, which is the virus that causes AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome). While this virus is the underlying cause of AIDS,[5] not all HIV-positive individuals have AIDS, as HIV can remain in a latent state for many years. If undiagnosed or left untreated, HIV usually progresses to AIDS, defined as possessing a CD4+ lymphocyte count under 200 cells/μl or HIV infection plus co-infection with an AIDS-defining opportunistic infection.



Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy (HAART) in many cases allows the stabilization of the patient's symptoms, partial recovery of CD4+ T-cell levels, and reduction in viremia (the level of virus in the blood) to low or near-undetectable levels. Disease-specific drugs can also alleviate symptoms of AIDS and even cure specific AIDS-defining conditions in some cases. Medical treatment can reduce HIV infection in many cases to a survivable chronic condition. However, these advances do not constitute a cure, since current treatment regimens cannot eradicate latent HIV from the body.

High levels of HIV-1 (often HAART-resistant) develop if treatment is stopped, if compliance with treatment is inconsistent, or if the virus spontaneously develops resistance to an individual's regimen.[6] Antiretroviral treatment known as post-exposure prophylaxis reduces the chance of acquiring an HIV infection when administered within 72 hours of exposure to HIV.[7] These problems mean that while HIV-positive people with low viremia are less likely to infect others, the chance of transmission always exists. In addition, people on HAART may still become sick.

Sexual intercourse with a virgin will cure AIDS

The myth that sex with a virgin will cure AIDS is prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa.[8][9][10] Sex with an uninfected virgin does not cure an HIV-infected person, and such contact will expose the uninfected individual to HIV, potentially further spreading the disease. This myth has gained considerable notoriety as the perceived reason for certain sexual abuse and child molestation occurrences, including the rape of infants, in Africa.[8][9]

Sexual intercourse with an animal will avoid or cure AIDS

In 2002, the National Council of Societies for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (NSPCA) in Johannesburg, South Africa, recorded beliefs amongst youths that sex with animals is a means to avoid AIDS or cure it if infected.[11] As with "virgin cure" beliefs, there is no scientific evidence suggesting a sexual act can actually cure AIDS, and no plausible mechanism by which it could do so has ever been proposed. The risk of contracting HIV via sex with animals is small, but the practice has its own health risks.

HIV antibody testing is unreliable

Diagnosis of infection using antibody testing is a well-established technique in medicine. HIV antibody tests exceed the performance of most other infectious disease tests in both sensitivity (the ability of the screening test to give a positive finding when the person tested truly has the disease) and specificity (the ability of the test to give a negative finding when the subjects tested are free of the disease under study). Many current HIV antibody tests have sensitivity and specificity in excess of 96% and are therefore extremely reliable.[12] While most patients with HIV show an antibody response after six weeks, window periods vary and may occasionally be as long as three months.[13]

Progress in testing methodology has enabled detection of viral genetic material, antigens, and the virus itself in bodily fluids and cells. While not widely used for routine testing due to high cost and requirements in laboratory equipment, these direct testing techniques have confirmed the validity of the antibody tests.[14][15][16][17][18][19]

Positive HIV antibody tests are usually followed up by retests and tests for antigens, viral genetic material and the virus itself, providing confirmation of actual infection.

HIV infection

HIV can be spread through casual contact with an HIV infected individual

One cannot become infected with HIV through normal contact in social settings, schools, or in the workplace. One cannot be infected by shaking someone's hand, by hugging or "dry" kissing someone, by using the same toilet or drinking from the same glass as an HIV-infected person, or by being exposed to coughing or sneezing by an infected person.[20][21] Saliva carries a negligible viral load, so even open-mouthed kissing is considered a low risk. However, if the infected partner or both of the performers have blood in their mouth due to cuts, open sores, or gum disease, the risk is higher. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has only recorded one case of possible HIV transmission through kissing (involving an HIV-infected man with significant gum disease and a sexual partner also with significant gum disease),[22] and the Terence Higgins Trust says that this is essentially a no-risk situation.[23]

Other interactions that could theoretically result in person-to-person transmission include caring for nose bleeds and home health care procedures, yet there are very few recorded incidents of transmission occurring in these ways. A handful of cases of transmission via biting have occurred, though this is extremely rare.[24]

HIV-positive individuals can be detected by their appearance

Due to media images of the effects of AIDS, many people believe that individuals infected with HIV always appear a certain way, or at least appear different from an uninfected, healthy person. In fact, disease progression can occur over a long period of time before the onset of symptoms, and as such, HIV infections cannot be detected based on appearance.[25]

HIV cannot be transmitted through oral sex

The risk of contracting HIV through oral sex is not impossible, but it is lower than from anal sex and penile–vaginal intercourse.[26]

HIV is transmitted by mosquitoes

When mosquitoes bite a person, they do not inject the blood of a previous victim into the person they bite next. Mosquitoes do, however, inject their saliva into their victims, which may carry diseases such as dengue fever, malaria, yellow fever, or West Nile virus and can infect a bitten person with these diseases. HIV is not transmitted in this manner.[27] On the other hand, a mosquito may have HIV-infected blood in its gut, and if swatted on the skin of a human who then scratches it, transmission is hypothetically possible,[28] though this risk is extremely small, and no cases have yet been identified through this route.

HIV survives for only a short time outside the body

HIV can survive at room temperature outside the body for hours if dry (provided that initial concentrations are high),[29] and for weeks if wet (in used syringes/needles).[30] However, the amounts typically present in bodily fluids do not survive nearly as long outside the body—generally no more than a few minutes if dry.[22] Again, the amount of time is longer if wet, especially in syringes/needles and related equipment.

HIV can infect only homosexual men and drug users

In the United States, the main route of infection for males is via homosexual anal sex, while for women transmission is primarily through heterosexual contact.[31] Nevertheless, HIV can infect anybody, regardless of age, sex, ethnicity, or sexual orientation.[32][33][34][35][36][37] It is true that anal sex (regardless of the gender of the receptive partner) carries a higher risk of infection than most sex acts, but most penetrative sex acts between any individuals carry some risk. Properly used condoms can reduce this risk.[38]

An HIV-infected mother cannot have children

HIV-infected women remain fertile, although in late stages of HIV disease a pregnant woman may have a higher risk of miscarriage. Normally, the risk of transmitting HIV to the unborn child is between 15 and 30%. However, this may be reduced to just 2–3% if patients carefully follow medical guidelines.[34][39]

HIV cannot be the cause of AIDS because the body develops a vigorous antibody response to the virus

This reasoning ignores numerous examples of viruses other than HIV that can be pathogenic after evidence of immunity appears. Measles virus may persist for years in brain cells, eventually causing a chronic neurologic disease despite the presence of antibodies. Viruses such as Cytomegalovirus, Herpes simplex virus, and Varicella zoster may be activated after years of latency even in the presence of abundant antibodies. In other animals, viral relatives of HIV with long and variable latency periods, such as visna virus in sheep, cause central nervous system damage even after the production of antibodies.[40]

HIV has a well-recognized capacity to mutate to evade the ongoing immune response of the host.[41]

Only a small number of CD4+ T-cells are infected by HIV, not enough to damage the immune system

Although the fraction of CD4+ T-cells that is infected with HIV at any given time is never high (only a small subset of activated cells serve as ideal targets of infection), several groups have shown that rapid cycles of death of infected cells and infection of new target cells occur throughout the course of the disease.[42] Macrophages and other cell types are also infected with HIV and serve as reservoirs for the virus.

Furthermore, like other viruses, HIV is able to suppress the immune system by secreting proteins that interfere with it. For example, HIV's Tat, has been demonstrated to suppress T cell activity.

Infected lymphocytes express the Fas ligand, a cell-surface protein that triggers the death of neighboring uninfected T-cells expressing the Fas receptor.[43] This "bystander killing" effect shows that great harm can be caused to the immune system even with a limited number of infected cells.

History of HIV/AIDS

HIV was introduced to North America by a Canadian flight attendant

A Canadian airline steward named Gaëtan Dugas was referred to as "Patient 0" in an early AIDS study by William Darrow of the CDC. Many people consider Dugas to be responsible for bringing HIV to North America. This is considered inaccurate, as HIV had spread long before Dugas began his career. This rumor may have started with Randy Shilts' 1987 book And the Band Played On (and the movie based on it, in which Dugas is referred to as AIDS' Patient Zero), but neither the book nor the movie state him to have been the first to bring the virus to North America. He was called "Patient Zero" because at least 40 of the 248 people known to be infected by HIV in 1983 had had sexual intercourse with him, or with someone who had sexual intercourse with him.

The current consensus is that HIV was introduced to North America by a Haitian immigrant who contracted it while working in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in the early 1960s, or from another person who worked there during that time.[44]

Origin of AIDS through human–monkey sexual intercourse

While HIV is most likely a mutated form of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), a disease present only in chimpanzees and African monkeys, highly plausible explanations for the transfer of the disease between species (zoonosis) exist not involving sexual intercourse.[45] In particular, the African chimpanzees and monkeys which carry SIV are often hunted for food, and epidemiologists theorize that the disease may have appeared in humans after hunters came into blood-contact with monkeys infected with SIV that they had killed.[46] The first known instance of HIV in a human was found in a person who died in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1959,[47] and a recent study dates the last common ancestor of HIV and SIV to between 1884 and 1914 by using a molecular clock approach.[48]

Tennessee State Senator Stacey Campfield was the subject of controversy in 2012 after stating that AIDS was the result of a human having sexual intercourse with a monkey.[49]

AIDS denialism

There is no AIDS in Africa, as AIDS is nothing more than a new name for old diseases

The diseases that have come to be associated with AIDS in Africa, such as cachexia, diarrheal diseases and tuberculosis have long been severe burdens there. However, high rates of mortality from these diseases, formerly confined to the elderly and malnourished, are now common among HIV-infected young and middle-aged people, including well-educated members of the middle class.[50]

For example, in a study in Côte d'Ivoire, HIV-seropositive individuals with pulmonary tuberculosis were 17 times more likely to die within six months than HIV-seronegative individuals with pulmonary tuberculosis.[51] In Malawi, mortality over three years among children who had received recommended childhood immunizations and who survived the first year of life was 9.5 times higher among HIV-seropositive children than among HIV-seronegative children. The leading causes of death were wasting and respiratory conditions.[52] Elsewhere in Africa, findings are similar.

HIV is not the cause of AIDS

There is broad scientific consensus that HIV is the cause of AIDS, but some individuals reject this consensus, including biologist Peter Duesberg, biochemist David Rasnick, journalist/activist Celia Farber, conservative writer Tom Bethell, and intelligent design advocate Phillip E. Johnson. (Some one-time skeptics have since rejected AIDS denialism, including physiologist Robert Root-Bernstein, and physician and AIDS researcher Joseph Sonnabend.)

A great deal is known about the pathogenesis of HIV disease, even though important details remain to be elucidated. However, a complete understanding of the pathogenesis of a disease is not a prerequisite to knowing its cause. Most infectious agents have been associated with the disease they cause long before their pathogenic mechanisms have been discovered. Because research in pathogenesis is difficult when precise animal models are unavailable, the disease-causing mechanisms in many diseases, including tuberculosis and hepatitis B, are poorly understood, but the pathogens responsible are very well established.[5]

AZT and other antiretroviral drugs, not HIV, cause AIDS

The vast majority of people with AIDS never received antiretroviral drugs, including those in developed countries prior to the licensure of AZT in 1987. Even today, very few individuals in developing countries have access to these medications.[53]

In the 1980s, clinical trials enrolling patients with AIDS found that AZT given as single-drug therapy conferred a modest (and short-lived) survival advantage compared to placebo. Among HIV-infected patients who had not yet developed AIDS, placebo-controlled trials found that AZT given as a single-drug therapy delayed, for a year or two, the onset of AIDS-related illnesses. The lack of excess AIDS cases and death in the AZT arms of these placebo-controlled trials effectively counters the argument that AZT causes AIDS.[40]

Subsequent clinical trials found that patients receiving two-drug combinations had up to 50% increases in time to progression to AIDS and in survival when compared to people receiving single-drug therapy. In more recent years, three-drug combination therapies have produced another 50–80% improvements in progression to AIDS and in survival when compared to two-drug regimens in clinical trials.[54] Use of potent anti-HIV combination therapies has contributed to dramatic reductions in the incidence of AIDS and AIDS-related deaths in populations where these drugs are widely available, an effect which would be unlikely if antiretroviral drugs caused AIDS.[55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64]

Behavioral factors such as recreational drug use and multiple sexual partners—not HIV—account for AIDS

The proposed behavioral causes of AIDS, such as multiple sexual partners and long-term recreational drug use, have existed for many years. The epidemic of AIDS, characterized by the occurrence of formerly rare opportunistic infections such as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) did not occur in the United States until a previously unknown human retrovirus—HIV—spread through certain communities.[65][66]

Compelling evidence against the hypothesis that behavioral factors cause AIDS comes from recent studies that have followed cohorts of homosexual men for long periods of time and found that only HIV-seropositive men develop AIDS. For example, in a prospectively studied cohort in Vancouver, British Columbia, 715 homosexual men were followed for a median of 8.6 years. Among 365 HIV-positive individuals, 136 developed AIDS. No AIDS-defining illnesses occurred among 350 seronegative men, despite the fact that these men reported appreciable use of nitrite inhalants ("poppers") and other recreational drugs, and frequent receptive anal intercourse (Schechter et al., 1993).[67]

Other studies show that among homosexual men and injection-drug users, the specific immune deficit that leads to AIDS—a progressive and sustained loss of CD4+ T-cells—is extremely rare in the absence of other immunosuppressive conditions. For example, in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, more than 22,000 T-cell determinations in 2,713 HIV-seronegative homosexual men revealed only one individual with a CD4+ T-cell count persistently lower than 300 cells/µl of blood, and this individual was receiving immunosuppressive therapy.[68]

In a survey of 229 HIV-seronegative injection-drug users in New York City, mean CD4+ T-cell counts of the group were consistently more than 1000 cells/µl of blood. Only two individuals had two CD4+ T-cell measurements of less than 300/µl of blood, one of whom died with cardiac disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma listed as the cause of death.[69]

AIDS among transfusion recipients is due to underlying diseases that necessitated the transfusion, rather than to HIV

This notion is contradicted by a report by the Transfusion Safety Study Group (TSSG), which compared HIV-negative and HIV-positive blood recipients who had been given blood transfusions for similar diseases. Approximately 3 years following blood transfusion, the mean CD4+ T-cell count in 64 HIV-negative recipients was 850/µl of blood, while 111 HIV-seropositive individuals had average CD4+ T-cell counts of 375/µl of blood. By 1993, there were 37 cases of AIDS in the HIV-infected group, but not a single AIDS-defining illness in the HIV-seronegative transfusion recipients.[70][71]

High usage of clotting factor concentrate, not HIV, leads to CD4+ T-cell depletion and AIDS in hemophiliacs

This view is contradicted by many studies. For example, among HIV-seronegative patients with hemophilia A enrolled in the Transfusion Safety Study, no significant differences in CD4+ T-cell counts were noted between 79 patients with no or minimal factor treatment and 52 with the largest amount of lifetime treatments. Patients in both groups had CD4+ T-cell-counts within the normal range.[72] In another report from the Transfusion Safety Study, no instances of AIDS-defining illnesses were seen among 402 HIV-seronegative hemophiliacs who had received factortherapy.[73]

In a cohort in the United Kingdom, researchers matched 17 HIV-seropositive hemophiliacs with 17 HIV-seronegative hemophiliacs with regard to clotting factor concentrate usage over a ten-year period. During this time, 16 AIDS-defining clinical events occurred in 9 patients, all of whom were HIV-seropositive. No AIDS-defining illnesses occurred among the HIV-negative patients. In each pair, the mean CD4+ T-cell count during follow-up was, on average, 500 cells/µl lower in the HIV-seropositive patient.[74]

Among HIV-infected hemophiliacs, Transfusion Safety Study investigators found that neither the purity nor the amount of factor VIII therapy had a deleterious effect on CD4+ T-cell counts.[75] Similarly, the Multicenter Hemophilia Cohort Study found no association between the cumulative dose of plasma concentrate and incidence of AIDS among HIV-infected hemophiliacs.[76]

The distribution of AIDS cases casts doubt on HIV as the cause. Viruses are not gender-specific, yet only a small proportion of AIDS cases are among women

The distribution of AIDS cases, whether in the United States or elsewhere in the world, invariably mirrors the prevalence of HIV in a population. In the United States, HIV first appeared in populations of injection-drug users (a majority of whom are male) and gay men. HIV is spread primarily through unprotected sex, the exchange of HIV-contaminated needles, or cross-contamination of the drug solution and infected blood during intravenous drug use. Because these behaviors show a gender skew—Western men are more likely to take illegal drugs intravenously than Western women, and men are more likely to report higher levels of the riskiest sexual behaviors, such as unprotected anal intercourse—it is not surprising that a majority of U.S. AIDS cases have occurred in men.[77]

Women in the United States, however, are increasingly becoming HIV-infected, usually through the exchange of HIV-contaminated needles or sex with an HIV-infected male. The CDC estimates that 30 percent of new HIV infections in the United States in 1998 were in women. As the number of HIV-infected women has risen, so too has the number of female AIDS patients in the United States. Approximately 23% of U.S. adult/adolescent AIDS cases reported to the CDC in 1998 were among women. In 1998, AIDS was the fifth leading cause of death among women aged 25 to 44 in the United States, and the third leading cause of death among African-American women in that age group.[78]

In Africa, HIV was first recognized in sexually active heterosexuals, and AIDS cases in Africa have occurred at least as frequently in women as in men. Overall, the worldwide distribution of HIV infection and AIDS between men and women is approximately 1 to 1.[77] In sub-Saharan Africa, 57% of adults with HIV are women, and young women aged 15 to 24 are more than three times as likely to be infected as young men.[79]

HIV is not the cause of AIDS because many individuals with HIV have not developed AIDS

HIV infections have a prolonged and variable course. The median period of time between infection with HIV and the onset of clinically apparent disease is approximately 10 years in industrialized countries, according to prospective studies of homosexual men in which dates of seroconversion are known. Similar estimates of asymptomatic periods have been made for HIV-infected blood-transfusion recipients, injection-drug users and adult hemophiliacs.[80]

As with many diseases, a number of factors can influence the course of HIV disease. Factors such as age or genetic differences between individuals, the level of virulence of the individual strain of virus, as well as exogenous influences such as co-infection with other microbes may determine the rate and severity of HIV disease expression. Similarly, some people infected with hepatitis B, for example, show no symptoms or only jaundice and clear their infection, while others suffer disease ranging from chronic liver inflammation to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Co-factors probably also determine why some smokers develop lung cancer while others do not.[41][81][82]

HIV is not the cause of AIDS because some people have symptoms associated with AIDS but are not infected with HIV

Most AIDS symptoms result from the development of opportunistic infections and cancers associated with severe immunosuppression secondary to HIV.

However, immunosuppression has many other potential causes. Individuals who take transplant rejection or to treat autoimmune diseases can have increased susceptibility to unusual infections, as do individuals with certain genetic conditions, severe malnutrition and certain kinds of cancers. There is no evidence suggesting that the numbers of such cases have risen, while abundant epidemiologic evidence shows a very large rise in cases of immunosuppression among individuals who share one characteristic: HIV infection.[40][50]

The spectrum of AIDS-related infections seen in different populations proves that AIDS is actually many diseases not caused by HIV

The diseases associated with AIDS, such as Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PCP) and Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), are not caused by HIV, but rather result from the immunosuppression caused by HIV disease. As the immune system of an HIV-infected individual weakens, he or she becomes susceptible to the particular viral, fungal, and bacterial infections common in the community. For example, HIV-infected people in the Midwestern United States are much more likely than people in New York City to develop histoplasmosis, which is caused by a fungus. A person in Africa is exposed to pathogens different from individuals in an American city. Children may be exposed to infectious agents different from adults.[83]

HIV is the underlying cause of the condition named AIDS, but the additional conditions that may affect an AIDS patient are dependent upon the endemic pathogens to which the patient may be exposed.

AIDS can be prevented with complementary or alternative medicine

Many HIV-infected people turn to complementary and alternative medicine, such as traditional medicine, especially in areas where conventional therapies are less widespread.[84] However, the overwhelming majority of scientifically rigorous research indicates little or negative effect on patient outcomes such as HIV-symptom severity and disease duration, and mixed outcomes on psychological well-being.[85][86] It is important that patients notify their healthcare provider prior to beginning any treatment, as certain alternative therapies may interfere with conventional treatment.[87][88]

See also


  1. ^ Kallings LO (2008). "The first postmodern pandemic: 25 years of HIV/AIDS". Journal of Internal Medicine 263 (3): 218–43.  
  2. ^ "AIDS epidemic update" (PDF). World Health Organization. Retrieved 29 July 2011. 
  3. ^  
  4. ^  
  5. ^ a b "The Evidence that HIV Causes AIDS".  
  6. ^ Becker, S.; Dezii, C.M.; Burtcel, B.; Kawabata, H.; Hodder, S. (2002). "Young HIV-infected adults are at greater risk for medication nonadherence". Medscape General Medicine 4 (3): 21.  
  7. ^ Fan, H., Conner, R.F. and Villarreal, L.P. eds., ed. (2005). AIDS: science and society (4th ed.).  
  8. ^ a b Flanagan, Jane (2001-11-11). "South African men rape babies as 'cure' for Aids". Telegraph (London). Retrieved 2009-03-25. 
  9. ^ a b Meel, B.L. (2003). "1. The myth of child rape as a cure for HIV/AIDS in Transkei: a case report". Med. Sci. Law 43 (1): 85–88.  
  10. ^ Groce, N.E.; Trasi, R. (2004). "Rape of individuals with disability: AIDS and the folk belief of virgin cleansing". Lancet 363 (9422): 1663–1664.  
  11. ^ "Bestiality new Aids myth - SPCA", March 25, 2002; retrieved February 22, 2007
  12. ^ "HIV ASSAYS: OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS", World Health Organization, 2004
  13. ^ Gilbert, Mark; Krajden, Mel (July–August 2010). "Don’t wait to test for HIV". BC Medical Journal 52 (6): 308. 
  14. ^ Jackson, J.B.; Kwok, S.Y.; Sninsky, J.J.; Hopsicker, J.S.; Sannerud, K.J.; Rhame, F.S.; Henry, K.; Simpson, M.; Balfour, H.H. Jr; et al. (1990). "Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 detected in all seropositive symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals". J. Clin. Microbiol 28 (1): 16–9.  
  15. ^ Busch, M.P.; Eble, B.E.; Khayam-Bashi, H.; Heilbron, D.; Murphy, E.L.; Kwok, S.; Sninsky, J.; Perkins, H.A.; Vyas, G.N.; et al. (1991). "Evaluation of screened blood donations for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection by culture and DNA amplification of pooled cells". N. Engl. J. Med. 325 (1): 1–5.  
  16. ^ Silvester, C.; Healey, D.S.; Cunningham, P.; Dax, E.M. (1995). "Multisite evaluation of four anti-HIV-1/HIV-2 enzyme immunoassays. Australian HIV Test Evaluation Group". J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 8 (4): 411–9.  
  17. ^ Urassa, W.; Godoy, K.; Killewo, J.; Kwesigabo, G.; Mbakileki, A.; Mhalu, F.; Biberfeld, G. (1999). "The accuracy of an alternative confirmatory strategy for detection of antibodies to HIV-1: experience from a regional laboratory in Kagera, Tanzania". J. Clin. Virol 14 (1): 25–29.  
  18. ^ Nkengasong, J.N.; Maurice, C.; Koblavi, S.; Kalou, M.; Yavo, D.; Maran, M.; Bile, C.; N'guessan, K.; Kouadio, J.; et al. (1999). "Evaluation of HIV serial and parallel serologic testing algorithms in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire". AIDS 13 (1): 109–117.  
  19. ^ Samdal, H.H.; Gutigard, B.G.; Labay, D.; Wiik, S.I.; Skaug, K.; Skar, A.G. (1996). "Comparison of the sensitivity of four rapid assays for the detection of antibodies to HIV-1/HIV-2 during seroconversion". Clin. Diagn. Virol 7 (1): 55–61.  
  20. ^ Madhok, R.; Gracie, J.A.; Lowe, G.D.; Forbes, C.D. (1986). "Lack of HIV transmission by casual contact". Lancet 328 (8511): 863.  
  21. ^ Courville, T.M.; Caldwell, B.; Brunell, P.A. (1998). "Lack of evidence of transmission of HIV-1 to family contacts of HIV-1 infected children". Clin. Pediatr. 37 (3): 175–178.  
  22. ^ a b "Kissing and HIV"
  23. ^ THT: "Ways HIV is not passed on"
  24. ^ Bartholomew, Courtenay F; Jones, Avion M. "Human bites: a rare risk factor for HIV transmission".  
  25. ^  
  26. ^ Yu, M; Vajdy, M (August 2010). "Mucosal HIV transmission and vaccination strategies through oral compared with vaginal and rectal routes". Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 10 (8): 1181–95.  
  27. ^ Webb, P.A.; Happ, C.M.; Maupin, G.O.; Johnson, B.J.; Ou, C.Y.; Monath, T.P. (1989). "Potential for insect transmission of HIV: experimental exposure of Cimex hemipterus and Toxorhynchites amboinensis to human immunodeficiency virus". J. Infect. Dis. 160 (6): 970–977.  
  28. ^ Siemens, D.F. (1987). "AIDS Transmission and Insects". Science 238 (4824): 143.  
  29. ^ Resnick, L.; Veren, K.; Salahuddin, S.Z.; Tondreau, S.; Markham, P.D. (1986). "Stability and inactivation of HTLV-III/LAV under clinical and laboratory environments". JAMA 255 (14): 1887–1891.  
  30. ^ Heimer, R.; Abdala, N. (2000). "Viability of HIV-1 in syringes: implications for interventions among injection drug users". AIDS Reader 10 (7): 410–7.  
  31. ^ "HIV Surveillance - Epidemiology of HIV Infection (through 2008)". Center for Disease Control. Retrieved 1 March 2011. 
  32. ^ Ammann, A.J.; Wara, D.W.; Cowan, M.J. (1984). "Pediatric acquired immunodeficiency syndrome". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 437: 340–349.  
  33. ^ Clumeck, N.; Mascart-Lemone, F.; de Maubeuge, J.; Brenez, D.; Marcelis, L. (1983). "Acquired immune deficiency syndrome in Black Africans". Lancet 321 (4): 642.  
  34. ^ a b Groginsky, E.; Bowdler, N.; Yankowitz, J. (1998). "Update on vertical HIV transmission". J Reprod Med 43 (8): 637–46.  
  35. ^ Oxtoby, M.J. (1990). "Perinatally acquired human immunodeficiency virus infection". Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 9 (9): 609–19.  
  36. ^ Ryder, RW; Hassig, SE (1988). "The epidemiology of perinatal transmission of HIV". AIDS. 2 Suppl 1: S83–9.  
  37. ^ Van Der Graaf, M; Diepersloot, RJ (1986). "Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV/HTLV-III/LAV): a review". Infection 14 (5): 203–211.  
  38. ^ "Condoms and STDs: Fact Sheet for Public Health Personnel".  
  39. ^ WHO, 2005
  40. ^ a b c "DISEASE PROGRESSION DESPITE ANTIBODIES", "The Relationship Between the Human Immunodeficiency Virus and the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome", National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, September, 1995
  41. ^ a b Levy, J.A. (1993). "Pathogenesis of human immunodeficiency virus infection". Microbiol. Rev. 57 (1): 183–289.  
  42. ^ Richman, D.D. (2000). "Normal physiology and HIV pathophysiology of human T-cell dynamics". J. Clin. Invest. 105 (5): 565–566.  
  43. ^ Xu, X.N.; Laffert, B.; Screaton, G.R.; Kraft, M.; Wolf, D.; Kolanus, W.; Mongkolsapay, J.; McMichael, A.J.; Baur, A.S.; et al. (1999). "Induction of Fas ligand expression by HIV involves the interaction of Nef with the T cell receptor zeta chain". J. Exp. Med. 189 (9): 1489–1496.  
  44. ^ "'"Key HIV strain 'came from Haiti. BBC News. 2007-10-30. Retrieved 2010-05-04. 
  45. ^ Locatelli, S; Peeters, M (Mar 27, 2012). "Cross-species transmission of simian retroviruses: how and why they could lead to the emergence of new diseases in the human population". AIDS 26 (6): 659–73.  
  46. ^ Sharp, PM; Hahn, BH (September 2011). "Origins of HIV and the AIDS Pandemic". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 1 (1): a006841.  
  47. ^ Zhu, T.; Korber, B.T.; Nahmias, A.J.; Hooper, E.; Sharp, P.M.; Ho, D.D. (1998). "An African HIV-1 sequence from 1959 and implications for the origin of the epidemic". Nature 391 (6667): 594–597.  
  48. ^ Worobey, Michael; Gemmel, Marlea; et al. (2 October 2008). "Direct evidence of extensive diversity of HIV-1 in Kinshasa by 1960".  
  49. ^ "'"Stacey Campfield, Tennessee Senator Behind 'Don't Say Gay' Bill, On Bullying, AIDS And Homosexual 'Glorification. The Huffington Post. 2012-01-26. Retrieved 2012-01-30. 
  50. ^ a b UNAIDS, 2000
  51. ^ Ackah, A.N.; Coulibaly, D.; Digbeu, H.; Diallo, K.; Vetter, K.M.; Coulibaly, I.M.; Greenberg, A.E.; De Cock, K.M. (1995). "Response to treatment, mortality, and CD4 lymphocyte counts in HIV-infected persons with tuberculosis in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire". Lancet 345 (8950): 607–610.  
  52. ^ Taha, T.E.; Kumwenda, N.I.; Broadhead, R.L.; Hoover, D.R.; Graham, S.M.; Van Der, Hoven L.; Markakis, D.; Liomba, G.N.; Chiphangwi, J.D.; et al. (1999). "Mortality after the first year of life among human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected and uninfected children". Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 18 (8): 689–694.  
  53. ^ UNAIDS, 2003
  54. ^ HHS, 2005
  55. ^ Palella, F.J. Jr; Delaney, K.M.; Moorman, A.C.; Loveless, M.O.; Fuhrer, J.; Satten, G.A.; Aschman, D.J.; Holmberg, S.D. (1998). "Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. HIV Outpatient Study Investigators". N. Engl. J. Med. 338 (13): 853–860.  
  56. ^ Mocroft, A.; Vella, S.; Benfield, T.L.; Chiesi, A.; Miller, V.; Gargalianos, P.; Arminio Monforte, A.; Yust, I.; Bruun, J.N.; et al. (1998). "Changing patterns of mortality across Europe in patients infected with HIV-1. EuroSIDA Study Group". Lancet 352 (9142): 1725–1730.  
  57. ^ Mocroft, A.; Katlama, C.; Johnson, A.M.; Pradier, C.; Antunes, F.; Mulcahy, F.; Chiesi, A.; Phillips, A.N.; Kirk, O.; et al. (2000). "AIDS across Europe, 1994-98: the EuroSIDA study". Lancet 356 (9226): 291–296.  
  58. ^ Vittinghoff, E.; Scheer, S.; O'Malley, P.; Colfax, G.; Holmberg, S.D.; Buchbinder, S.P. (1999). "Combination antiretroviral therapy and recent declines in AIDS incidence and mortality". J. Infect. Dis. 179 (3): 717–720.  
  59. ^ Detels, R.; Munoz, A.; McFarlane, G.; Kingsley, L.A.; Margolick, J.B.; Giorgi, J.; Schrager, L.K.; Phair, J.P. (1998). "Effectiveness of potent antiretroviral therapy on time to AIDS and death in men with known HIV infection duration. Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study Investigators". JAMA 280 (17): 1497–1503.  
  60. ^ De Martino, M; Tovo, PA; Balducci, M; Galli, L; Gabiano, C; Rezza, G; Pezzotti, P (2000). "Reduction in mortality with availability of antiretroviral therapy for children with perinatal HIV-1 infection. Italian Register for HIV Infection in Children and the Italian National AIDS Registry". JAMA 284 (2): 190–7.  
  61. ^ Hogg, R.S.; Yip, B.; Kully, C.; Craib, K.J.; O'Shaughnessy, M.V.; Schechter, M.T.; Montaner, J.S. (1999). "Improved survival among HIV-infected patients after initiation of triple-drug antiretroviral regimens". CMAJ 160 (5): 659–65.  
  62. ^ Schwarcz, S.K.; Hsu, L.C.; Vittinghoff, E.; Katz, M.H. (2000). "Impact of protease inhibitors and other antiretroviral treatments on acquired immunodeficiency syndrome survival in San Francisco, California, 1987–1996". Am. J. Epidem. 152 (2): 178–185.  
  63. ^ Kaplan, JE; Hanson, D; Dworkin, MS; Frederick, T; Bertolli, J; Lindegren, ML; Holmberg, S; Jones, JL (2000). "Epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus-associated opportunistic infections in the United States in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy". Clinical Infectious Diseases. 30 Suppl 1: S5–S14.  
  64. ^ McNaghten, A.D.; Hanson, D.L.; Jones, J.L.; Dworkin, M.S.; Ward, J.W.; The Adultadolescent Spectrum Of Disease Group +/ (1999). "Effects of antiretroviral therapy and opportunistic illness primary chemoprophylaxis on survival after AIDS diagnosis. Adult/Adolescent Spectrum of Disease Group". AIDS 13 (13): 1687–1695.  
  65. ^ NIAID, 1995a
  66. ^ NIAID, 1995b
  67. ^ Schechter, M.T.; Craib, K.J.; Gelmon, K.A.; Montaner, J.S.; Le, T.N.; O'Shaughnessy, M.V.; Schechter, M.T.; Gelmon, K.A.; Montaner, J.S.G. (1993). "HIV-1 and the aetiology of AIDS". Lancet 341 (8846): 658–659.  
  68. ^ Vermund, S.H.; Hoover, D.R.; Chen, K. (1993). "CD4+ counts in seronegative homosexual men. The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study". N. Engl. J. Med. 328 (6): 442.  
  69. ^ Des Jarlais, D.C.; Friedman, S.R.; Marmor, M.; Mildvan, D.; Yancovitz, S.; Sotheran, J.L.; Wenston, J.; Beatrice, S. (1993). "CD4 lymphocytopenia among injecting drug users in New York City". J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 6 (7): 820–2.  
  70. ^ Donegan, E.; Stuart, M.; Niland, J.C.; Sacks, H.S.; Azen, S.P.; Dietrich, S.L.; Faucett, C.; Fletcher, M.A.; Kleinman, S.H.; et al. (1990). "Infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) among recipients of antibody-positive blood donations". Annals of Internal Medicine 113 (10): 733–9.  
  71. ^ Cohen, J. (1994). "Duesberg and critics agree: hemophilia is the best test". Science 266 (5191): 1645–1646.  
  72. ^ Hassett, J.; Gjerset, G.F.; Mosley, J.W.; Fletcher, M.A.; Donegan, E.; Parker, J.W.; Counts, R.B.; Aledort, L.M.; Lee, H.; et al. (1993). "Effect on lymphocyte subsets of clotting factor therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-1-negative congenital clotting disorders. The Transfusion Safety Study Group". Blood 82 (4): 1351–7.  
  73. ^ Aledort, L.M.; Operskalski, E.A.; Dietrich, S.L.; Koerper, M.A.; Gjerset, G.F.; Lusher, J.M.; Lian, E.C.; Mosley, J.W. (1993). "Low CD4+ counts in a study of transfusion safety. The Transfusion Safety Study Group". N. Engl. J. Med. 328 (6): 441–442.  
  74. ^ Sabin, C.A.; Pasi, K.J.; Phillips, A.N.; Lilley, P.; Bofill, M.; Lee, C.A. (1996). "Comparison of immunodeficiency and AIDS defining conditions in HIV negative and HIV positive men with haemophilia A". BMJ 312 (7025): 207–10.  
  75. ^ Gjerset, G.F.; Pike, M.C.; Mosley, J.W.; Hassett, J.; Fletcher, M.A.; Donegan, E.; Parker, J.W.; Counts, R.B.; Zhou, Y.; et al. (1994). "Effect of low- and intermediate-purity clotting factor therapy on progression of human immunodeficiency virus infection in congenital clotting disorders. Transfusion Safety Study Group". Blood 84 (5): 1666–71.  
  76. ^ Goedert, JJ; Kessler, CM; Aledort, LM; Biggar, RJ; Andes, WA; White Gc, 2nd; Drummond, JE; Vaidya, K; et al. (1989). "A prospective study of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and the development of AIDS in subjects with hemophilia". The New England Journal of Medicine 321 (17): 1141–1148.  
  77. ^ a b U.S. Census Bureau, 1999
  78. ^ NIAID FACT Sheet: HIV/AIDS Statistics
  79. ^ UNAIDS, 2005
  80. ^ Alcabes, P.; Munoz, A.; Vlahov, D.; Friedland, G.H. (1993). "Incubation period of human immunodeficiency virus". Epidemiol. Rev. 15 (2): 303–18.  
  81. ^ Evans, A.S. (1982). "The clinical illness promotion factor: a third ingredient". Yale J. Biol. Med. 55 (3–4): 193–9.  
  82. ^ Fauci, A.S. (1996). "Host factors and the pathogenesis of HIV-induced disease". Nature 384 (6609): 529–534.  
  83. ^ USPHS/IDSA, 2001
  84. ^ Littlewood, RA; Vanable, PA (8 Dec 2011). "A global perspective on complementary and alternative medicine use among people living with HIV/AIDS in the era of antiretroviral treatment". Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 8 (4): 257–268.  
  85. ^ Mills, Edward; Wu, Ping; Ernst, Edzard (June 2005). "Complementary therapies for the treatment of HIV: in search of the evidence". International Journal of STD & AIDS 16 (6): 395–403.  
  86. ^ Littlewood, Rae A; Vandable, Peter A (June 2002). "Complementary and alternative medicine use among HIV-positive people: research synthesis and implications for HIV care". AIDS Care 20 (8): 1002–1018.  
  87. ^ Piscitelli, Stephen C; Burstein, Aaron H; Chaitt, Doreen; Alfaro, Raul; Falloon, Judith (14 April 2001). "Indinavir concentrations and St John's wort". The Lancet 355 (9203): 547–548.  
  88. ^ Piscitelli, Stephen; Burstein, Aaron H.; Weldon, Nada; Gallicano, Keith D.; Falloon, Judith (Jan 2002). "The Effect of Garlic Supplements on the Pharmacokinetics of Saquinavir". Clinical Infectious Diseases 34 (2): 234–238.  

External links

  • - The U.S. Federal Domestic HIV/AIDS Resource
  • - Find an HIV testing site near you
  • – A website that presents the scientific evidence that HIV is the cause of AIDS and that the benefits of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) outweigh the risks. It was created by research scientists and community advocates engaged in the worldwide struggle against HIV/AIDS.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.