World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Rape of Chichester

Article Id: WHEBN0034673765
Reproduction Date:

Title: Rape of Chichester  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Sussex, Rape of Arundel, History of Sussex, Sussex trug, We wunt be druv
Collection: History of Sussex
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Rape of Chichester

Remains of Chichester Castle, the original administrative centre of the Rape

The Rape of Chichester is one of the rapes, the traditional sub-divisions unique to the historic county of Sussex in England. The most westerly of the Sussex rapes, the rape of Chichester is a former barony, originally based around Chichester Castle in the city of Chichester.


  • History 1
  • Location 2
  • Sub-divisions 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • External links 6


The rape is not mentioned independently of 'the rape of Earl Roger' in the Domesday Book[1] and passed by inheritance as a single unit, out of all proportion to the other rapes in size, until the 13th century. First mentioned as the 'Bailiwick (Balliua) of Chichester' in 1264, it first appeared by name as the rape of Chichester in the Hundred Rolls of 1275.[2] It was referred to as the Rape de Cycestre in 1279,[1] le rape de Cicestre[1] in 1376 and of Chichestre in 1495.[1]

The rape of Chichester was created out of the larger rape of Arundel. It would seem likely that the creation of this new division was connected with the partition of the estates of Hugh d'Aubigny, 5th Earl of Arundel, the last Earl of Arundel of his line, between his co-heirs after his death in 1243. While John FitzAlan acquired Arundel, Robert de Mohaut obtained the overlordship of the twelve fees constituting the honor of Halnaker, and certain other estates in the vicinity. The unity of overlordship being thus lost, it may have appeared convenient to divide this district into two separate rapes, which would be of a similar size and nature to those in the rest of Sussex. No trace of any orders given or measures taken to create the division of the old rape of Arundel has been found.

It is possible that the rape of Chichester may have existed before the Norman conquest. The rapes in general pre-date the Norman conquest and many rapes are based on King Alfred's fortifications in the Burghal Hidage. As Chichester was also a fortification in the Burghal Hidage, it is quite possible that it existed as a separate administrative unit in the Saxon era and was merged with neighbouring Arundel rape by William the Conqueror and given to Earl Roger of Montgomery. William might of course have created five rapes only, one of which, out of all proportion to the others in size, was afterwards divided, but for this there is no evidence.[1]

The population of the rape of Chichester was 21,608 in 1801,[3] rising to 24,200 in 1811[3] and 30,659 in 1831.[4]


Location of the rape of Chichester within Sussex

The most westerly of all the Sussex rapes, the rape of Chichester borders the rape of Arundel to the east, with the county of Hampshire lying to the west and the county of Surrey to the north. The boundary between the Rapes of Chichester and Arundel started on the coast at the small stream dividing the parish of Pagham from that of Felpham.[2] The boundary ran roughly due north, except for a divagation eastwards to include the parish of Slindon, which was a peculiar of the Archbishop of Canterbury and so was attached to the archbishop's hundred of Pagham.[2] Once established it remained unaltered, the only change in the contents of the Rape being in 1844, when under the Counties (Detached Parts) Act 1844 the long narrow strip constituting North and South Ambersham was annexed to Sussex.[2] Until that time it had been a detached part of the county of Hampshire, part of the parish of Steep.[2]

The rape of Chichester includes the city of Chichester and the towns of Bognor Regis, Midhurst and Selsey. Its highest point is Blackdown, which at 280 metres (919 feet) is the highest point in all of Sussex.


The rape is traditionally divided into the following hundreds:

See also


  1. ^ a b c d e Mawer, Allen, F. M. Stenton with J. E. B. Gover (1929, 1930). Sussex - Part I and Part II. English Place-Name Society. 
  2. ^ a b c d e f "Victoria County History - The rape of Chichester". British History Online. Retrieved 9 Feb 2012. 
  3. ^ a b Dallaway, James (1815). A History of the Western Division of the County of Sussex, Volume 1. T. Bensley. 
  4. ^ Bell, James (1836). A New and Comprehensive Gazeteer of England and Wales Vol. 1. A Fullarton & Co. 

External links

  • The Victoria County History for Sussex - Chichester Rape
  • Chichester Rape through time - A Vision of Britain
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.