World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Social conservatism in the United States

Article Id: WHEBN0031858887
Reproduction Date:

Title: Social conservatism in the United States  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Republican Party (United States), Timeline of modern American conservatism, Conservatism in the United States, Constitution Party (United States), Values Voter Summit
Collection: Conservatism in the United States, Social Policy
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Social conservatism in the United States

Social conservatism in the United States is a political ideology that focuses on the preservation of what are seen as traditional values. The accepted goals and ideologies related to preserving traditions and morality often vary from group to group within social conservatism. Thus, there are really no policies or positions that could be considered universal among social conservatives. There are, however, a number of general principles to which at least a majority of social conservatives adhere, such as support for traditional family values.


Social conservatives emphasize what they describe as traditional views of social units such as the family, church, or locality. Social conservatism may entail opposition to same-sex marriage and abortion.

In the 1920s, religious fundamentalists like William Bell Riley and William Jennings Bryan led the battle against the teaching of evolution, a battle which fundamentalists are still fighting today, when fundamentalist Protestants often advocate the teaching of creationism in the public schools.

Conservatives tend to strongly identify with American nationalism and patriotism. They denounce anti-war protesters and hail the police and the military. Conservatives hold that military institutions embody admirable values like honor, courage, devotion, and loyalty, and also admire their tradition and ritual pageantry.

Historically, free market and social conservative elements were politically separate (but also not necessarily opposed) in the United States. An alliance of convenience was generated between them in the last half of the twentieth century under the doctrine of Fusionism, created by the ex-communist Frank Meyer, editor of the National Review.[1]

Electoral politics

In American politics, the Republican Party is the largest political party with some socially conservative ideals incorporated into its platform. Voters who are concerned with socially conservative issues often support the Republican Party, although there are also socially-conservative Democrats who break ranks with the party platform. Despite this, there have been instances where the Republican Party's nominee has been considered too socially progressive by social conservatives. This has led to the support of third party candidates from parties such as the Constitution Party, whose philosophies more closely parallel that of social conservatism.[2] While many social conservatives see third parties as a viable option in such a situation, some high-profile social conservatives see the excessive support of them as dangerous. This fear arises from the possibility of vote splitting.[3] Social conservatives, like any other interest-group, usually must find a balance between pragmatic electability and ideological principles when supporting candidates.[4]

Commentator Randall Hoven of The American Thinker has remarked, "Using the National Journals ratings of Senators in 2007, the correlation coefficient between "economic" scores and "social" scores is 90%. That means they almost always go together; financial conservatives are social conservatives and vice versa".[5]

The American Tea Party movement, despite being mostly made up of stringent Social Conservatives, is economically conservative but generally avoids social conservative issues, and this is a deliberate strategy.[6] The Tea Party Patriots is officially neutral[7] on social conservatism. While social conservatism emphasizes faith and family as core values, the Tea Party Patriots identifies its "Core Values" as "Fiscal Responsibility, Constitutionally Limited Government, Free Markets."[8] Some branches are opposed[9] to social conservatism. However, independent polls have repeatedly shown that Tea Party supporters are nearly indistinguishable in their views from traditional Republican social conservatives, despite their choice to emphasize economic issues.[10][11][12][13] While not allying itself exclusively with the Christian conservative movement,[14] members of the Tea Party movement identify with the Christian conservative movement more strongly than the general American populace (44%[15] compared to 34%[16] of the population), and some social conservative leaders have denounced it for its "libertarian" and "irreligious" views.[17] Nearly 80% of those in the Tea Party movement are members of the Republican party.[18]


  1. ^ "Articles - The End of Republican 'Fusionism'?". RealClearPolitics. March 1, 2008. Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  2. ^ "huffingtonpost news story on NY23". October 29, 2009. Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  3. ^ Drake, Bruce. "Romney tells Tea Party not to split vote". Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  4. ^ Third Party Alternative to McCain (Although no third party siphoned any significant percentage from McCain, such voter sentiment truly existed during the campaign)
  5. ^ "A Libertarian Defense of Social Conservatism". American Thinker. Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  6. ^ "Tea parties stir evangelicals' fears - Ben Smith". Politico.Com. Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  7. ^ Zernike, Kate (March 12, 2010). "Tea Party Avoids Divisive Social Issues". The New York Times. 
  8. ^ "Mission Statement and Core Values". Tea Party Patriots. Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  9. ^ "» Tea Party Leaders Release Letter Urging House and Senate GOP to Avoid Social Issues". November 23, 2010. Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  10. ^ ANALYSIS (February 23, 2011). "Tea Party and Religion - Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life". Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  11. ^ Siegel, Elyse (Released June 2, 2010). "More Than Half Of Tea Party Supporters Say Gays And Lesbians Have Too Much Political Power (POLL)". The Huffington Post. Retrieved July 1, 2010. 
  12. ^ New poll looks at tea party views toward minorities The Seattle Times; June 1, 2010
  13. ^ 'Tea party' groups plan Arizona rally against illegal immigration"", The Washington Post, August 11, 2010
  14. ^
  15. ^ Przybyla, Heidi (March 26, 2010). "Tea Party Advocates Who Scorn Socialism Want a Government Job". Bloomberg News. Retrieved March 28, 2010. 
  16. ^ Barry A. Kosmin and Ariela Keysar (2009) "American Religious Identification Survey (ARIS) 2008" Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut, USA; Retrieved April 1, 2009 (PDF)
  17. ^ "Tea parties stir evangelicals' fears - Ben Smith". Politico.Com. Retrieved March 30, 2011. 
  18. ^ "Tea Party Supporters Overlap Republican Base". Retrieved March 30, 2011. 

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.