World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Kennedy v. Louisiana

Article Id: WHEBN0015377003
Reproduction Date:

Title: Kennedy v. Louisiana  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Rape in the United States, 2007 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Anthony Kennedy, Anthony Kennedy, Ronald Wolfe (rapist), Capital punishment in Louisiana
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Kennedy v. Louisiana

Kennedy v. Louisiana
Argued April 16, 2008
Decided June 25, 2008
Full case name Patrick O. Kennedy v. State of Louisiana
Docket nos. 07-343
Citations 554 U.S. 407 (more)
128 S. Ct. 2641; 171 L. Ed. 2d 525; 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5262; 2008 WL 2511282; 08 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7920; 76 U.S.L.W. 4584; 2008 Daily Journal D.A.R. 9470; 21 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 472
Prior history Defendant convicted, sentenced, La. Dist. Ct., Aug. 26, 2003; aff'd, State v. Kennedy, 957 So.2d 757 (La. 2007); cert. granted, 552 U.S. 1087, 128 S. Ct. 829 (2008)
Procedural history Writ of Certiorari to the Louisiana Supreme Court
Argument Oral argument
Holding
It is unconstitutional to impose the death penalty for the crime of raping a child, when the victim does not die and death was not intended. Louisiana Supreme Court reversed and remanded to lower court for resentencing.
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Kennedy, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Dissent Alito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. VIII; La. Stat. Ann. §14:42

Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause did not permit a state to punish the crime of rape of a child with the death penalty; more broadly, the power of the state to impose the death penalty against an individual for committing a crime that did not result in the death of the victim is now limited to crimes against the state (e.g., espionage, treason).

Background

Patrick O'Neal Kennedy (born December 13, 1964),[1] a man from Harvey, Louisiana in Greater New Orleans,[2] was sentenced to death after being convicted of raping and sodomizing his eight-year-old stepdaughter. The rape was uncommonly brutal: it tore the victim's perineum "from her vaginal opening to her anal opening. [It] tore her vagina on the interior such that it separated partially from her cervix and allowed her rectum to protrude into her vagina. Invasive emergency surgery was required to repair these injuries."[3] Kennedy maintained that the battery was committed by two neighborhood boys, and refused to plead guilty when a deal was offered to spare him from a death sentence.[4] Nevertheless, he was convicted in 2003 and sentenced under a 1995 Louisiana law that allowed the death penalty for the rape of a child under the age of 14; the law was ruled unconstitutional in 2008.[5]

On appeal, Kennedy challenged the constitutionality of executing a person solely for child rape, and the Atkins v. Virginia and Roper v. Simmons, first examining whether there is a national consensus on the punishment and then considering whether the court would find the punishment excessive. The Louisiana Supreme Court concluded that the adoption of similar laws in five other states, coupled with the unique vulnerability of children, satisfied Atkins and Roper.[7]

Kennedy was one of two men in the country under sentence of death for a crime other than murder; the other, Richard L. Davis, had been sentenced under the same Louisiana law.[8] Kennedy sought direct review of the Louisiana Supreme Court's decision in the Supreme Court of the United States,[9] which agreed to hear the case in January 2008.[10]

U.S. Supreme Court

In seeking [11]

The case pitted the Eighth Amendment definition of "cruel and unusual punishment" over states' rights as defined in the Tenth Amendment, with the issue being whether states may constitutionally impose the death penalty for any crime other than murder as a principle of a state's right to impose punishment as it saw fit, under the Tenth Amendment, and, in particular, whether a death sentence is a disproportionate penalty, under the Eighth Amendment, for raping a child. No person has been executed in the United States for rape since 1964.[12]

Jefferson Parish, Louisiana assistant district attorney Juliet L. Clark argued for the State of Louisiana and Texas Solicitor General R. Ted Cruz argued for the State of Texas and other amicus curiae states.[11]

Questions presented

  1. Does the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause permit a State to use the death penalty to punish the crime of rape of a child?
  2. If so, does Louisiana's capital rape statute violate the Eighth Amendment insofar as it fails genuinely to narrow the class of such offenders eligible for the death penalty?[13]

Opinion of the Supreme Court

Majority

On June 25, 2008, the Supreme Court, splitting 5–4, held that "[t]he Eighth Amendment bars Louisiana from imposing the death penalty for the rape of a child where the crime did not result, and was not intended to result, in the victim's death." In its majority opinion authored by [15]

Curiously, the majority opinion left open the possibility of the death penalty for "drug kingpins", as well as treason, espionage and terrorism, these being considered crimes against "the State" rather than against "individual persons":

"Our concern here is limited to crimes against individual persons. We do not address, for example, crimes defining and punishing treason, espionage, terrorism, and drug kingpin activity, which are offenses against the State."[16]

Dissent

In his dissent Justice Alito sharply criticized the majority for usurping the role of the legislature. Alito argued that Kennedy's rationale for defining national consensus was flawed, because the previous Coker decision had "stunted legislative consideration of the question whether the death penalty for the targeted offense of raping a young child is consistent with prevailing standards of decency." In this Alito followed former Chief Justice Warren Burger, who had dissented from Coker because it, in his view, prevented a full debate over the uses of the recently reinstated death penalty. In this vein, Alito also argued that "The Eighth Amendment protects the right of an accused. It does not authorize this Court to strike down federal or state criminal laws on the ground that they are not in the best interests of crime victims or the broader society."[17]

Factual error

A central point of the court's analysis was the observation that child rape was a capital offense in only six states, and that no other state, nor any federal jurisdiction, authorized the death penalty for that crime.

Three days after the case was decided, Dwight Sullivan, a military blogger, noted that Congress had revised the Uniform Code of Military Justice in 2006 to add child rape to the list of offenses punishable in the military by death.[18][19] None of the 10 briefs filed with the Court, and neither the majority nor dissent, mentioned the provision. On July 2, 2008, Linda Greenhouse of The New York Times highlighted Sullivan's post, bringing the issue to national attention.[20]

After the error was discovered, supporters of the law—including the governors of Missouri and Louisiana, and 85 members of Congress—petitioned for rehearing. The United States Department of Justice also filed a brief supporting rehearing. It noted that it too had missed the 2006 amendment; since it has a duty to defend all federal laws, and since the decision called that law into question, it was duty–bound to favor rehearing.[21]

The court requested briefs from both the state and the defense on the matter with the possibility of amending the ruling. On October 1, 2008, however, the Supreme Court decided 7–2 not to revisit its decision. In addition to the majority of five in the original case,[22] Scalia and Roberts also filed a concurrence, writing that "the views of the American people on the death penalty for child rape were, to tell the truth, irrelevant to the majority’s decision in this case [...] and there is no reason to believe that absence of a national consensus would provoke second thoughts."[23] Only Thomas and Alito voted for the rehearing.

Reaction

The decision was handed down in the run-up to a presidential election and both the Democratic and Republican presidential candidates, Barack Obama and John McCain, criticized the majority opinion.

Barack Obama said at a news conference in Chicago:

Obama also argued that the high court had gone too far in restricting the powers of the states. If the court had "said we want to constrain the abilities of states to do this to make sure that it’s done in a careful and appropriate way, that would have been one thing. But it basically had a blanket prohibition and I disagree with that decision."[24]

John McCain responded to the ruling by calling it:

In January 2009, U.S. Senator for Louisiana David Vitter introduced S. Res. 4, "A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the Supreme Court of the United States erroneously decided Kennedy v. Louisiana, No. 07-343 (2008), and that the eighth amendment to the Constitution of the United States allows the imposition of the death penalty for the rape of a child." This resolution was never voted upon by the full Senate and died in committee when the 111th Congress adjourned.[26]

Since the Supreme Court decision set aside the death sentence, the Louisiana Supreme Court remanded the case back to the district court for resentencing. After a brief hearing, Kennedy was sentenced to life without parole on January 7, 2009, this being the mandatory sentence for this crime.[27]

See also

References

  1. ^
  2. ^ Purpura, Paul. "Patrick Kennedy, whose conviction led to ban on executing child rapists, to remain in prison during appeal." The Times-Picayune. December 20, 2013. Retrieved on March 16, 2014.
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^ Louisiana Revised Statutes §§ 14:42(A)(4), (D)(2)(a).
  6. ^ See Louisiana v. Kennedy, 957 So.2d 757 (La. 2007)
  7. ^ Id.; see also
  8. ^
  9. ^ See 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a) ("Final judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had, may be reviewed by the Supreme Court by writ of certiorari where the validity of ... a statute of any State is drawn in question on the ground of its being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States....")
  10. ^
  11. ^ a b U.S. Supreme Court Docket 07-343 - Retrieved April 27, 2008
  12. ^
  13. ^ U.S. Supreme Court Docket 07-343 - Questions Presented - Retrieved April 27, 2008
  14. ^
  15. ^ Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407, 437 (2008) (“[T]he death penalty should not be expanded to instances where the victim’s life was not taken.”).
  16. ^ , p26–27Kennedy v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States,
  17. ^ Kennedy v. Louisiana, Alito, J., dissenting, slip op., at 15.
  18. ^
  19. ^
  20. ^
  21. ^
  22. ^
  23. ^
  24. ^
  25. ^
  26. ^ S.Res. 4
  27. ^

External links

  • Resource PagePatrick Kennedy v. LouisianaSex Crimes: : Contains Merits/Amicus Briefs & Media Links
  • U.S. Supreme Court Argument Transcript
  • Kennedy v. LouisianaOyez:
  • (07-343)Kennedy v. LouisianaLegal Information Institute Bulletin: Cornell University Law School -
  • Text Opinion
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.