World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Synod of Dort

The Synod of Dort. The Arminians are seated at the table in the middle.
Dates in this article are according to the Julian Calendar. Sources using the Old Style calendar will need to be adjusted by adding ten days.

The Synod of Dort (also known as the Synod of Dordt or the Synod of Dordrecht) was an international Synod held in Dordrecht in 1618–1619, by the Dutch Reformed Church, to settle a divisive controversy initiated by the rise of Arminianism. The first meeting was on November 13, 1618, and the final meeting, the 154th, was on May 9, 1619. Voting representatives from eight foreign Reformed churches were also invited. Dort was a contemporary English term for the town of Dordrecht (and it remains the local colloquial pronunciation).

In 2014 the first entire, critical edition of the Acts and Documents of the Synod was begun to be published.[1]


  • Background 1
  • Purpose 2
  • Delegates 3
  • Proceedings 4
  • The Canons of Dort 5
  • Aftermath 6
  • Bible translation 7
  • Political impact 8
  • See also 9
  • References 10
  • Further reading 11
  • Notes 12
  • External links 13


There had been previous provincial synods of Dort, and a National Synod in 1578. For that reason the 1618 meeting is sometimes called the Second Synod of Dort.

The acts of the Synod were tied to political intrigues that arose during the Twelve Years' Truce, a pause in the Dutch war with Spain. After the death of Jacob Arminius his followers presented objections to the Belgic Confession and the teaching of John Calvin, Theodore Beza, and their followers. These objections were published in a document called The Remonstrance of 1610, and the Arminians were therefore also known as Remonstrants. They taught election on the basis of foreseen faith, a universal atonement, resistible grace, and the possibility of lapse from grace. The opposing Calvinists or Gomarists, led by Franciscus Gomarus of the University of Leiden, became known as the Contra-Remonstrants.

The Arminians were perceived as ready to compromise with the Spanish, whereas the Dutch Calvinists were not, so Arminianism was considered by some to be political treason; in 1617–8 there was a pamphlet war and Francis van Aarssens expressed the view that the Arminians were working for Philip IV of Spain.[2] Planning for a National Synod was begun by Adriaan Pauw in March 1618.[3] Before that, there had been a debate as to whether the synod should be national, as the Contra-Remonstrants wished, or provincial for Holland, as the Remonstrants argued. This decision was worked out in 1617, with outside input from the English ambassador Dudley Carleton.[4]


The purpose of the Synod was to settle the controversy over Arminianism. It was subsequently alleged that the outcome had already been decided. According to Frederick Calder, "condemnation [of the Remonstrant doctrines] was determined before the national synod met."[5] On the other hand, beyond the condemnation of the Arminians, the theological formulations of the Canons of the Synod by no means gave support to all the Gomarists wanted. The more extreme views of Dutch Calvinists were moderated in the detailed debates.[6]


The Synod had members representing Reformed groups from continental Europe, as well as from the British isles. Among these groups were also Anglican delegates from the Church of England[7] and the Church of Scotland.[8]


Simon Episcopius (1583–1643) was spokesman of the 14 Remonstrants who were summoned before the Synod in 1618. At the opening of the synod, Episcopius asked to speak.

"Episcopius [...] insisted on being permitted to begin with a refutation of the Calvinistic doctrines, especially that of reprobation, hoping that, by placing his objections to this doctrine in front of all the rest, he might excite such prejudice against the other articles of the system, as to secure the popular voice in his favor. The Synod, however, very properly, reminded him [...] that, as the Remonstrants were accused of departing from the Reformed faith, they were bound first to justify themselves, by giving Scriptural proof in support of their opinions. The Arminians would not submit to this plan of procedure because it destroyed their whole scheme of argument [...] and were thus compelled to withdraw. Upon their departure, the Synod proceeded without them."[9]

He concluded by expressing his dissatisfaction with the organization of the assembly, and that the Contra-Remonstrants had prevented an accurate representation of the Arminian supporters in the Dutch Reformed Church with votes in the synod.[10] A delegation of Episcopius, Bernard Dwinglo and Johannes Arnoldi Corvinus called on the Church of England representatives, and other coming from outside, asking for support and giving written accounts of the context. After that a month was spent on procedural matters concerning the Remonstrants. They were finally ejected from the Synod at session 57 on 14 January.[11]

The Canons of Dort

Calvinism portal

The Synod concluded with a rejection of the Arminian views, and set forth the Reformed doctrine on each point, namely: total depravity, unconditional election, limited atonement (arguing that Christ's atoning work was intended only for the elect and not for the rest of the world), irresistible (or irrevocable) grace, and the perseverance of the saints. These are sometimes referred to as the Five points of Calvinism. The Decision of the Synod of Dort on the Five Main Points of Doctrine in Dispute in the Netherlands, popularly known as the Canons of Dort, is the explanation of the judicial decision of the Synod.[12] In the original preface, the Decision is called:

a judgment, in which both, the true view agreeing with God's word concerning the aforesaid five points of doctrine is explained and, the false view disagreeing with God's Word is rejected.


The thirteen Remonstrant ministers, including Episcopius, had been charged to remain in Dort until further instruction. On May 20, 1619, the Remonstrant ministers who had been present were summoned by the lay-commissioners of the synod and directed to abstain from ministerial activities such as preaching, exhorting, administering the sacraments, and visiting the sick. Furthermore, Episcopius was commanded not to write letters or books promoting the doctrines of the Remonstrants. The Remonstrants agreed to refrain from ministering in the government-ordained churches, but confessed their duty to expound their doctrines wherever people would assemble to hear them.[13]

On July 5, they were called to the States-General assembly where they were requested to sign The Act of Cessation, the legalization of the order to desist from the ministry. When they refused to sign it, they were sentenced as "disturbers of the public peace" and ordered to leave the United Provinces.[14] However, in the 18th century, Arminian theology spread to England where it became integral to the theology of the Methodist churches.[15]

Bible translation

The synod also initiated an official Dutch Bible translation (the Statenvertaling, i.e. Translation of the States) from the original languages that would be completed in 1637. Translators were appointed, and the States-General were asked to fund the project. It had a lasting impact on the standard Dutch language, which was just then beginning to gain wider acceptance and developing a literary tradition. It would remain the standard translation in Protestant churches for more than three centuries and still is used in some sister churches of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations and similar, smaller denominations.

Political impact

The Synod condemned the religious doctrine of Arminianism as heresy. There followed the political condemnation of the statesman Johan van Oldenbarnevelt who had been the protector of the Remonstrants. For the crime of general perturbation in the state of the nation, both in Church and State (treason), he was beheaded on 13 May 1619, only four days after the final meeting of the Synod. As consequence of the Arminian defeat the jurist Hugo Grotius was given a life sentence in prison; but he escaped with the help of his wife. Both Van Oldenbarnevelt and Grotius had in fact been imprisoned since 29 August 1618.

See also


  • Frederick Calder (1835), Memoirs of Simon Episcopius, London: Simpkin and Marshall.
  • Jonathan I. Israel (1986), The Dutch Republic and the Hispanic World 1606–1661
  • Jonathan I. Israel (1998), The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness and Fall
  • Anthony Milton (2005), The British Delegation and the Synod of Dort (1618–1619)

Further reading

  • Acta et Documenta Synodi Nationalis Dordrechtanae (1618–1619) (2014)

Donald Sinnema, Christian Moser, Herman Selderhuis (eds.) Vol. I, CVII, 539 pag. ISBN 978-3-525-55078-6 Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen

  • Anthony Milton (ed.) (2005) The British Delegation and the Synod of Dort (1618-19) (Church of England Record Society)

by Anthony Milton (Editor)

  • Brown Patterson, W. (1990). "The Synod of Dort and the Early Stuart Church" [i.e., the Church of England], This Sacred History: Anglican Reflections, [festschrift] for John Booty, ed. Donald S. Armentrout (Cambridge, Mass.: Cowley Publications), p. 199-221. ISBN 1-56101-003-0
  • Hoeksema, Homer C. (2013). The Voice of Our Fathers: an Exposition of the Canons of Dordrecht. Second ed. Jenison, Mich.: Reformed Free Publishing Association. N.B.: The publisher's first ed. appeared in 1980. ISBN 978-1-936054-26-8


  1. ^ Acta et Documenta Synodi Nationalis Dordrechtanae (1618–1619) Donald Sinnema, Christian Moser, Herman Selderhuis (eds.) Vol. I, CVII, 539 pag. ISBN 978-3-525-55078-6 Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen
  2. ^ Israel (1986), pp. 62–3.
  3. ^ Israel (1998), p. 456.
  4. ^ Milton, p. 2; Google Books.
  5. ^ Calder, pp. 270–271.
  6. ^ W. B. Patterson, King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom (1997), Ch. 8, for a full account.
  7. ^ The British Delegation and the Synod of Dort (1618-19) (Church of England Record Society) 2005
  8. ^  
  9. ^ Thomas Scott, The Articles of the Synod of Dort, Sprinkle Publ., 1993 reprint, p.5.
  10. ^ Calder, p. 311. See Chapter X for Episcopius's entire oration and chapter XI on the proceedings of the synod.
  11. ^ Milton, pp. 147–8; Google Books.
  12. ^ Peterson, Robert; Williams, Michael (2004), Why I am not an Arminian, Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, p. 124,  
  13. ^ Calder, pp. 388–389.
  14. ^ Calder, p. 389.
  15. ^ Olson, Roger E. (20 August 2009). Arminian Theology. InterVarsity Press. p. 14.  

External links

  • Canons of Dort at CRC home
  • Canons of Dort at
  • The Ivdgement of the Synode Holden At Dort
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from Hawaii eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.