This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate? Excessive Violence Sexual Content Political / Social
Email Address:
Article Id: WHEBN0022283799 Reproduction Date:
Veganarchism or vegan anarchism, is the political philosophy of veganism (more specifically animal rights and earth liberation) and anarchism,[2][3] creating a combined praxis that is designed to be a means for social revolution.[4][5] This encompasses viewing the state, as well as hierarchical or authoritarian structures in general, as unnecessary and harmful to animals, both human and non-human, whilst practising a vegan lifestyle. It is either perceived as a combined theory, or that both philosophies are essentially the same.[6] It is further described as an anti-speciesist perspective on green anarchism, or an anarchist perspective on animal liberation.[5]
Veganarchists typically view oppressive dynamics within society to be interconnected, from statism, racism and sexism to human supremacy[7] and redefine veganism as a radical philosophy that sees the state as harmful to animals.[8] Ideologically, it is a human, animal, and Earth liberation movement that is fought as part of the same struggle. Those who believe in veganarchy can be either against reform for animals or for it, although do not limit goals to changes within the law.[9][10]
The philosophy was first popularised by Brian A. Dominick in Animal Liberation and Social Revolution[1] and later promoted by anarcho-punk band Virus using symbolism, Roots of Compassion, a zine named 'veganarchy', and animal rights activist Jonny Albewhite.[2][3][11] The ideology is sometimes referred to as radical veganism, total liberation, or total revolution; however, not all who believe in the terms perceive them to be veganarchy.[7][8]
The term was popularised in 1995 with Brian A. Dominick's pamphlet Animal Liberation and Social Revolution, described as "a vegan perspective on anarchism or an anarchist perspective on veganism".[1] It was originally published by Critical Mess Media, then in 1997 re-printed by Firestarter Press and re-distributed for anti-copyright usage.[17][18] In 2002 it was translated into Portuguese by Discórdia edições and into German by Autonome Tierbefreiungsaktion Hannover in 2005, further circulating the essay abroad.[19][20]
The 18-page pamphlet explains how many young anarchists in the 1990s had been adopting deep ecological (animal-inclusive and anti-speciesist) mindsets as part of an overall green-anarchist political philosophy. Similarly animal liberationists were becoming increasingly influenced by anarchist thought and traditions, thus becoming veganarchists and adopting an overall praxis.[5]
Brian Dominick described his reasons for the necessity of veganarchism in the opening chapter The Veganarchists:[4]
In Animal Liberation and Social Revolution, Brian A. Dominick describes how he believes relationships between oppressive dynamics within the establishment are interconnected, including; classism, economic oppression, statism, sexism, homophobia, patriarchy, racism (founded within ethnocentrism), ageism, and the result of human supremacy; speciesism and environmental destruction. He claims that throughout history the state has been dependent on these interdependent oppressions.[7] It is further understood that the fate of all species are intricately interrelated, so the exploitation of animals must play a major role on the impact of the human world. This includes the domestication of animals as being partly responsible for the "emergence of patriarchy, state power, slavery, hierarchy and domination of all kinds".
On radical veganism, Dominick defines what veganism means, concluding that to not consume the products of non-human animals is not the true meaning of the term, but one of its lifestyle choices; differentiating it from pure vegetarianism. He criticises self-proclaimed vegans who justify care free consumption of corporate products, citing poor workers conditions and treatment of human labor, comparing them to non-human suffering. Dominick therefore defines veganism as a radical understanding of what human and non-human animal oppression really is, therefore determining lifestyle choices by an informed and politicized opinion.
Dominick describes veganarchists as either opposed to reformist measures for animals (considering them the task of liberals or progressives), such as granting non-humans suffrage, or include but do not limit their goals to changes within the law.[9] He criticises the need for the state to stand between humans and non-humans, detailing increased crime and violence due to alcohol prohibition and the war on drugs, believing a government orchestrated "War on Meat" would only cause more problems rather than curb animal abuse and the reinforced desires for animal products; preferring instead a non-coercive approach to eliminating animal consumption.[10]
In Violence in Everyday Life, Brian A. Dominick labels society as being largely based on violence, enhanced by corporate control media images.[10] Dominick depicts power as a social concept and that "those on the receiving end of violence naturally suffer a severe amount of disempowerment", usually asserting what little remaining power they have left. He affirms that victims often internalize oppression, carrying it with them, hence becoming victimizers. Further discussing violence, Dominick regards the abuse of animals - whether directly, as with the mistreatment of pets, or indirectly by eating meat, as correlating to social violence.
Some veganarchists engage in Food Not Bombs, Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC), the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and Earth Liberation Front (ELF), in autonomous, covert cells, they may take action against the meat and dairy industries, animal testing laboratories, fur farms, logging industries and, more rarely, government institutions.
Such actions are normally, though not always, non-violent. Though not necessarily veganarchists, activists have used the names Animal Rights Militia (ARM), Revolutionary Cells – Animal Liberation Brigade (RCALB), Justice Department, and others to claim responsibility for politically motivated violent attacks.
Reference: Making A Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights [Paperback] Bob Torres
Peter Singer, Immanuel Kant, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Hinduism, Buddhism
Libertarianism, Emma Goldman, Libertarian socialism, Politics, Socialism
Simple living, Sustainable development, Animal rights, Environment, Environmentalism
Monarchy, Anarchism, Public administration, Politics, Communism
Anarchism, Anarcho-primitivism, Henry David Thoreau, Politics, Animal rights
Free love, Revolution, Henry David Thoreau, Max Stirner, Leo Tolstoy